campaign claims that the election was rigged. mr. strozk countered even if trump s chances of victory of low, lie dying before you are 40, the stakes are too high to justify inaction. well, that is laughable and it proves our point. the deep state, the top players not rank and file desperately trying to spin all of this damning, all of this incriminating evidence. another new breaking story to tell you about tonight. anonymous government sources have been repeatedly leaking to the media details about the f.b.i. informant who did spy on the trump campaign. at the same time, they are accusing president, republican, even people like me of putting this informant s life in danger. i have known his name for a full week. this is the latest example from washington post. bigger than watergate. trump joins push by allies to expose the role of an f.b.i. source. they are falsely smearing not only the president and congressional republicans and yours truly.
that the election was rigged. mr. strzok countered that even if mr. trump s chances of victory were low, like dying before you are 40, the stakes are too high to justify inactio inaction. that s laughable and it proves our point. the deep state, these top players, not rank and file, desperately trying to spin all of this incriminating evidence. another new breaking story to tell you about tonight, anonymous government sources have been repeatedly looking to the media details about the fbi informant who did spy on the trump campaign played at the same time, they are accusing the president, republicans, even people like me, of putting this informant s life in danger. i ve known thean guy s name fora full week. here s the latest example from the washington post. bigger than watergate trump joints pushed by allies to expose the role of an fbi source. they are falsely smearing not only thens president and congressional republicans and yours truly, no, we are trying
the problem is he s doing as much muddling as he s trying to clarify. whether it s this, whether all of it. let s take it apart. he has no incriminating evidence on himself. you only get to raid someone s lawyer s home and offices if there is so much incriminating evidence that you are afraid they re destroying said incriminating evidence. look, as much as they try to cast doubt on this investigation, there are career law enforcement officials who are working on this. there are judges granting warrants that have advanced this investigation. clearly there is evidence there. the fact that there is this strong campaign to discredit this investigation shows just how strong the evidence is there. the more they protest, the more it feels like there is some there-there. an innocent person, someone who is the subject of an investigation, who doesn t think it s really legitimate would sit back and say, go ahead. right. i ll wait to show me what you
they shouldn t get caught. there was one e-mail that was described to us and don jr. was to have said don t worry. no one will find out because the only people that know about it are on the e-mail and trump organization. but prosecutors did find out about it and went very seriously into the information and were seriously considering impanelling a special grand jury at the moment of which point trump s personal lawyer intervened and tells about the president and his children. right. that lawyer provided a statement to the rachel maddow show saying it s ethical and unrelated. when you look at the kids, the trump kids, putting incriminating evidence in e-mail, something their father avoided. he says he doesn t use e-mail to help you get caught. what is your takeaway about the kids and any implications for this russia investigation? well, i have written a lot of
hillary clinton and he believed that he should hear them out. which had which is really a complete other version of the story as to why he took the meeting. as you know, it was initially said that it was about adoptions. the accounts or explanation of this june 9th meeting has changed and evolved over time. but the plain fact is, that the principal e-mail, leading to the meeting, led donald trump, jr., to think he would receive incriminating evidence. in other words, dirt about hillary clinton. to which he responded love it. now, that s the lead to the meeting. and we still are unclear about who said what to whom, and what followed the meeting, equally important, whether there were additional meetings or other e-mails and that is why additional testimony is necessary by him and by others,