it is only affecting the top rungs of the income ladder. my paul steve moore put out a piece in the journal not too long ago. average real median income. the middle of the middle, $65,000 a year, up $4100 in a couple of years under president trump. and then again almost $3,000 family married filing jointly on the tax cut. people are prospering across the board. actually the lowest rungs are showing the highest wage increases. and so i think the economy is in pretty good shape. i think some folks have lost sight of that. sandra: are you concerned about the slowdown in manufacturing? i am. we re looking at that carefully. some things are beyond our control. the boeing problem. they stopped producing airplanes for a while. there is a gm strike with uaw. those things are not helping.
we have record employment lows w sense of the states where wages didn t go up but that s a booming economy. so that s the issue. can a booming economy left more votes than having the government s step in and say left the wages? again and again, we say what is the best way to get wages under the rise? i don t know if the top-down approach works. i m just looking at all the data here and we see with the minimum wage, more than half believe that low-wage job within a year and they go up the income ladder. so it s not that they are locked on that minimum wage job, they have mobility up and out. it s usually college-age students who have the minimum wage job and it s terrible that we are in this country where people are trying to easement, academic raise money on the minimum wage. the economy itself, there minimum wage goes up anyway. looking forward to see you tonight, young lady. the evening at it in the final
spending it via the government? apparently they think so. we re going to christy, emily and natalie. good to see you all. what is really going on here? i just don t get how it s ever helpful to talk about taking people s money and redistributing it. i think it s fundamentally anti-american. you can go all the way back to the founding fathers and the roots of our country. it s not what we re about. the democrats try to sell this wealth distribution. that s their vision. not a single democrat offered tax relief. even though it s headed every income ladder in this country. this is a tax cut across every
moderate. plenty of money. i don t know how many republicans are going to be losing the tax issue this fall as he did that i don t want to say lamb lied because i don t know his intention but the falsehood that only rich people got tax cuts, up and down the income ladder is very easily rebutted and for competent candidate talking about how everyone benefits and we are seeing wages go up as a result this is a winning issue. don t know how succone made a losing issue. democrat or republican say nancy pelosi will be speaker again. it didn t work because lamb said i don t like her either. hillary clinton that is going to work.
fifth third bank. what about at&t s motives might be doctoring other agencies giving bonuses. worker he had itsing youened spends monday on construction of fittings. this is within 48 hours of passage and a few hours of this bill being signed. i think next year is going to be a boon year for this economy. it s going to grow like crazy. the party of no. democrats said no to this and all these benefits will have trouble next november going before the voters as people enjoy these very beneficial things gee we didn t allow you to step up and have theme they voted no on all of these. shame on them. david: let s give a tax break to the poor and lower rungs of the income ladder. in this is the repeal of the obamacare mandate. 80% of the people according to the irs taxed by out obamacare mandate make under $50,000. wouldn t democrats be on board with this? after all, these people