Economical district it creates both district and removes the lot areas and the intensity will be limit by the open space they voted unanimously to recommend approval and the modification to both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. In the fillmore because of the areas troubled history with the redevelopment history the questions were based on lot area and supervisor wiener express his support and the racked density controls the Committee Voted Unanimously to with a positive recommendation this weeks board of supervisors was scald for the commissioner richards i supported the rezone and theres a car wash there one acre its been sold and development there project sponsor will double the units from 3 avoiding to plus housing no Affordable Housing fees tha
And as specifically on shortterm rentals how are they energy to do this under needs to be a formal report with the city attorneys advise thank you. Commissioner commissioners, if theres nothing further well move on to item 8 review of the past events of the board of appeals and the Historic Preservation commission. Good evening aaron with the Planning Department staff this week at the Land Use Commission they heard two items one was the establishment of the fillmore commercial district and the other of the visa determining economical district it creates both district and removes the lot areas and the intensity will be limit by the open space they voted unanimously to recommend approval and the modification to both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. I
Both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. In the fillmore because of the areas troubled history with the redevelopment history the questions were based on lot area and supervisor wiener express his support and the racked density controls the Committee Voted Unanimously to with a positive recommendation this weeks board of supervisors was scald for the commissioner richards i supported the rezone and theres a car wash there one acre its been sold and development there project sponsor will double the units from 3 avoiding to plus housing no Affordable Housing fees that Large Development has to pay; is that correct. Nothing particular mr. To the ordinance no. A cynical person wow. Is where he a windfall Public Policy dictates there are impacts and that co
Sorry in kind agreement to isolate some of the bends to the alley to solve those issues. I know the City Attorney has a comment. Yes. Deputy City Attorney Susan Cleveland i have a comment. Im asking for here but only for the staff. I want to let you know that supervisor avalos has authorized me to let the commission know hes kwrd requested our office to draft the legislation that includes the inclusionary and he perhaps other Board Members disagree are the interpretation of the Planning Department so thats underway. Thank you commissioner hillis. Yeah. I want to staying say i support it was odd reading the inclusionary didnt apply it is not a lot different from the prior project when western selma requires 40 percent 2 bedroom but the sro on its face dont mind but odd it didnt get captured in the inclusionary just to explore that it is not considered housing i thought inclusionary so as we read the code it states in section 415 it applies when it defines units as apartment unions. Are