had to of been or should have been incapacity at trooping the colour. this time, it is in the queen s platinumjubilee year, this time, it is in the queen s platinum jubilee year, and i this time, it is in the queen s platinumjubilee year, and i think pressure from all sides, very subtle, the queen and the prince of wales would have been well aware of this, and they said, now, it is time to step down because he is fighting this case. the second one is that where sadly, for him, he is a veterans of the falklands campaign and he would normally been very prominent in the commemoration of the 40th anniversary, which is already getting under way this year. robert, thank you for explaining the two areas this impacts. i wonder, do you think those within the military will be regretting this decision? i think, actually, some of them will be mightily relieved. i am not an
every citizen is going to make his own decision on risk, on prevention, on treatment, why in 2022 do they double down on the 2020 tool kit? do they not understand events? have they learned nothing? if only it were that simple. if only it was a mere case of governing elite stupidity. if only it was their characteristic incapacity in grasping events. it s something much worse. you must understand it because it is the difference between your future as a citizen and a different future as a subject. they persist in the masking and the lockdowns and the travel bans and the coercion because it expresses and enables their role, period. full stop. the masked anonymous drones holding the train of the progressive super star s party gown is exactly what they want americans to be. string identity is what they do these days whether it s poisoning your children against america in the public schools, tearing down monuments of our founders, or erasing your face
u.s. government on how to contain problems, disasters, vulnerabilities. trying to provide that expertise the ukrainians, if they can maintain control of that facility and the security perimeter. not being a nuclear expert myself, what did remind me of is the fukushima disaster in japan after the tsunami. where, the u.s. experts were kind of, in constant contact with the japanese about how do you contain any kind of potential fallout. and how to avoid an ex hopefully this does not end up at the scale of what fukushima was. but there is some theory echoes of it. when you talk about fires, and an incapacity to maintain a facility like this. indeed. we re also seeing more putin friendly all the guards with sanctions today. do we see how effective these sanctions have been?
own head. if you look at his advisers, brought in front of him, they look uncertain, they look a little afraid. this does not seem to be like a system that is functioning beyond the whims of one man, one rule. when you re in a circumstance now where he has clearly overreached and not only is he facing significant military and popular resistance in ukraine, he is facing a degree of sanctions from not just the united states but a unified europe that i just don t think he expected. if you are russian and waking up today with the entire economy cratering and the incapacity to perhaps even access your own reserves, the over $600 billion in that russian central bank, your relationship with the rest of the world will never be the same so long as the putin is the leader of russia. i think that means we are in
tough or negative for russia? any other off-ramps for how putin might get out of this without doing a full continued siege of the whole country? i don t see it. his forces demonstrated they are incapable of taking down all of ukraine, which is this vast country the size of texas as we all point out constantly. it s also got a lot of the texas sensibilities, sense of independence, highly armed population, a nation of hunters. a bad choice on the part of the russians to go after it, in my view. and over time the russians with their terrible logistics, their bad generalship, their incapacity to do anything at this point but simply pound cities in a siege mentality, it s not going to be a success for them. so i think the off-ramp for putin is to fall back to donbas and try to negotiate a solution. understood. former nato supreme allied commander james stavridis, thank