than, perhaps, the sort of conventional narrative that there s one factor that we can pinpoint to blame for a mass shooting, and that s kind of the reason why we wanted to highlight the four themes. inasmuch that whether is somebody is radicalized to the left or radicalized to the right, we have to take a step back and wonder what got them to that point in the first place, and this is where we see the early exposure to violence there childhood, we see a sort of tangible crisis point in people s lives, some sort of loss or some sort of grievance, and they re searching for something, and if they can find meaning in the words of a politician or in the writings of a prior mass shooter, they will latch onto those types of things and that can drive them forward. hey, james,vy ju vi have jus couple seconds left. you say one way to prevent a future mass shooting is to eliminate the ability to carry out a plan. would increasing gun control factor into that? absolutely. absolutely, it would.
to lie about matters of consequence and she quote-unquote only told white lies about small matters. asked if president trump told anyone to lie during the campaign, she answered, not that i can recall. when they asked if she read the mueller report, she replied, no, i lived the mueller report. chris cuomo joins not especially revealing and i guess not particularly surprising. revealing inasmuch as it shows this is a dead end and that the idea of going through the ordinary course of oversight isn t going to work here because the system allows for the executive to stymie it. and yes, you can go to court. but you wind up achieving the same end of stalling which is time. litigation takes time. hut are you working on tonight? we have chairman schiff here. he s going to tell us about the briefing on iran. what s the truth? was it intentional? is that clear? if so, why s the president who was in the same briefing with him calling it a mistake?
what s he giving out tours of the san francisco bay or something? before i state my points of disagreement. be a hard ass. go ahead. to my esteemed counsel let me say a couple things. look, this is a teachable moment for a number of reasons. number one, we know that judges are king in their courtroom. the prosecutor recommended 13 months, what did the judge say, no thank you. even stanford itself provided a victim impact statement where they said you ve cost us dearly, you ve cost us reputation nael, cost us as it related to the federal paul calls bs on that victim impact statement. now, this is this is good inasmuch as it demonstrates that courts are going to evaluate each defendant independently. we are in court every day arguing, look, my client is different from someone else. not everyone is similarly situated and that s a good thing, however, here is where it s a bad thing, i think that this there has to be some deterrent value. i don t care that you did not benefit
won t diminish in popularity, what sustains its popularity? sir, rock and roll has been around for many years. i personally don t think it will die completely out because they will have to get something mighty good to make it place what about taking the wiggle out of it? you take the wiggle out of it, it s finished. the 50s sees the birth of the teenager as a phenomena. during the great depression, if kids could be working, they were working. in the 50s, most teens did not have to work. they had allowances. there was idle time, time to get in trouble. the 50s had a radical side inasmuch as young people started to start their own culture. you had dating, which was a
foundation has actually been planning to dissolve since trump s election in 2016. the lawyer also said the lawsuit was politically motivated. wolf. mj, thanks very much. let s go back to our analysts. michael zeldin, how significant is this? well, it is significant inasmuch as it says there is a pattern of illegal activity that the trump organization has engaged in. that pattern of illegal activity we see again in the lawsuits that involve the inauguration, domestic and foreign contributions to the inauguration for the trump benefit, and also for the emoluments case where they are saying that they re profiting off of their time in office. so you see a pattern here of lawsuits, some by the government, some private sector, which says this essentially is a corrupt group of people running their operation for their own financial benefit. you know, jeffrey i have a somewhat go ahead. i have a somewhat different view. i think it is significant