working class people who are thrown out there and end up dying at work. they were paid £300. this is my uncle s family in 1921, £300 in compensation with three children under ten who did not have their father, and it affected the family for a long time. it was notjust that moment, it affects the family for a long time. injustice is what probably we felt. i for a long time. in ustice is what probably we felt. for a long time. in ustice is what probably we felt. i wouldn t know that at the probably we felt. i wouldn t know that at the time. probably we felt. i wouldn t know that at the time. so probably we felt. i wouldn t know that at the time. so your- probably we felt. i wouldn t know that at the time. so your dad, . probably we felt. i wouldn t know. that at the time. so your dad, tom, your mum, joan. your mum is irish, from a strong irish family. definitely. from a strong irish family. definitel . ., ., , ., ., definitely. your dad, they moved to west london. definitely
why, why did this happen i think it is plain to people why, why did this happen i think it is plain to people. so why, why did this happen i think it is plain to people. so what - why, why did this happen i think it is plain to people. so what they. why, why did this happen i think it. is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is the is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is the pain is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is the pain of- is plain to people. so what they are experiencing is the pain of loss, - experiencing is the pain of loss, especially experiencing is the pain of loss, especially the experiencing is the pain of loss, especially the pain experiencing is the pain of loss, especially the pain of experiencing is the pain of loss, especially the pain of loss - experiencing is the pain of loss, especially the pain of loss in -
4, some people been caught up in this without asking the sympathy but there s a sense of injustice among some of them. there s a sense of in ustice among some of them. some of them. some feel not ust embarrassed fl some of them. some feel not ust embarrassed but i some of them. some feel not ust embarrassed but quite some of them. some feel not ust embarrassed but quite hurt. h some of them. some feel notjust embarrassed but quite hurt. 0ne| some of them. some feel notjust i embarrassed but quite hurt. one of our insiders told us thatjunior staff didn t think there were breaking the rules because their bosses were there, notjust the prime minister but senior civil servants, who could find themselves under fire from sue gray tomorrow. the way that this has all played out, there s a sense of hurt and confusion. they feel they were promised that they would be protected. 0ne promised that they would be protected. one said he felt boris johnson was throwing stuff under a bus. i will
mitsubishi, a man who wants rub shoulders with presidents, but he was arrested injapan in 2018 and charged with serious financial crimes. a year later, he fled the country before his trial, hidden in this musical equipment box, and travels at limit him. he was escaping injustice to lebanon. i did not escape justice. escaping injustice to lebanon. i did not escapejustice. i escaping injustice to lebanon. i did not escape justice. i fled did not escapejustice. ifled injustice. mr did not escape ustice. i fled injusticah did not escape ustice. i fled in ustice. ~ , injustice. mr ghosn has always claimed he injustice. mr ghosn has always claimed he was injustice. mr ghosn has always claimed he was the injustice. mr ghosn has always claimed he was the victim - injustice. mr ghosn has always claimed he was the victim of i injustice. mr ghosn has always| claimed he was the victim of an elaborate japanese conspiracy designed to derail a merger he was planning between nissan an
dollars into the bankruptcy but essentially getting broad releases that will allow then never to face any litigation in the future. for opioid claims, ever again. the future. for opioid claims, ever again- the future. for opioid claims, ever aain. ,. , ever again. the udge described it as a better ever again. the judge described it as a better result ever again. the judge described it as a better result but - ever again. the judge described it as a better result but gave . it as a better result but gave practical reasons why he was happy that it had come to the stage. the family say that they acted ethically and lawfully butjust acted ethically and lawfully but just describe why there acted ethically and lawfully butjust describe why there is the sense of injustice against them. the sense of in ustice against them. ,, . ~ them. sure. the sackler firm usually the them. sure. the sackler firm usually the root them. sure. the sackler firm usually the root of them. sure. the sa