one question looms large, how will justice best be served? stay close. if you take up arms against the united states in the name of radical islam, you should be treated as a terrorist. declaring this man is an unlawful enemy combatant allows the government to hold him and it doesn t have to be at gitmo. n liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance. i enjoy the fresher things in life.o. fresh towels. fresh soaps. and of course, tripadvisor s freshest, lowest.
sg . the point he was making is he would support that. he wasn t necessarily advocating for it. he certainly would support it if he felt like that was the best move. are there advantages in terms of sending any terror suspect to guantanamo. that s a question we would have to dive into deeper and, certainly, walk with the process before answering that. senator john mccain indicated sending the attacker to gitmo is he s a terrorist and he should be kept there. he s from lindsey graham. when you find somebody associated with radical islam who takes up their cause and kills in the name of radical islam, what we should try to find out about that person is how did you get here? are you working with other people? under the law of war, i ve been a military lawyer for 33 years, we have the authority in the united states to detain this man as an unlawful enemy combat entity. you ll never convince me the best way to get intelligence in this war which is now in the
continue an investigation for so long? these are all the issues and everything that has to be determined. this is not somebody you call a lone wolf who happened to his own. he obviously had deep isis beliefs and the people he associated with were really bad characters from uzbekistan. sandra: how was the suspect being treated right now is a discussion. senator lindsey graham urging the white house to declare him an enemy combatant, listen to this. if you take up arms against the united states in the name of radical islam you should be treated as a terrorist. what i hope the trump administration will do is break from the obama administration s view that all terrorists are common criminals. the law does allow you to treat the terrorist differently than a common criminal. declaring this man as an unlawful enemy combatant would allow the government to hold them, and it doesn t have to be at gtmo. sandra: what you believe should happen with this?
we need to figure out how we cannot better identify people who will kill in the name of radical islam. eboni: is the system that needs to be fixed. my issue, i was just in paris, i spent a week they re not one month ago. when this happened, i literally had the hairs on my arms stand up in a way know that i have before. it also had very close to home for me. here s the issue. it s not unforeseeable, these acts, these horrible acts that are leaving people dead, countries and ruin, and the world more afraid are not unforeseeable and that s a big deal to me. we have identified many of these people, we have detained many of these people and yet, they go free. where is the chink in the system that is affording this to keep happening? newt: there s an obvious core problem. we continue to apply criminal justice standards by which correctly, the whole process. if we don t apply the rules of law of war.
refuse to confront how bad things are, it s almost like they re terrified of being honest about what the problems are. sandra: it makes you want to ask, are we safe here at home? do we have the policies in place to prevent this happening here? dagen: we have a problem with surveillance and identifying somebody who will willingly attack in the name of radical islam. you look at this the suspect, that he was questioned by police as early as february and he had been imprisoned in sweden. the attack in stockholm had been identified as a radical. it s not increased surveillance,