computer networks, cyber networks to get at us to attack us. i just want your response. it s an obvious question. we ve been asking, everyone says why red line when it comes to chemical weapons? why just chemical weapons when hundreds of thousands of people died by other means? that s a great point. we are telling the country blow your people up, we don t care, chop their heads off, we don t care, burn them, stab them, whatever, we don t care. use chemical weapon, now we care. the problem is if we launch missiles, if we initiate some form of attack at this point, you re giving the countries, other countries elied with syria, an excuse to help them to attack us with cyber weapons or with other technology that normally might not have come to play in this. secondly, if they say you re right, we are not going to use chemical weapons we ll go back to blowing them up, stabbing them, burning them, that s okay, right? you have no problem with that
fight in the congress. i think he ll eventually win it. it s important to remember that since world war i, presidents have gone to capitol hill on 18 occasions to ask for congressional backing for the use of force and they ve won every single time. 18-18. just the john mccain argument you had on the air, as much as i des grows with what the president would like to do, woe like a more expansive attack in the air fields and the like. john mccain also said we can t come to the day where congress strips the president of his commander in chief authority. i think a lot of members will come around to that. second thing is this. the way this is shaping up right now, i will tell you, the president doesn t have the congress nor public opinion, and there are going to be a growing number of people who will put pressure on him. you ve got to sell the country in order to sell the congress. they re going to push him to go out and make the case. i think we are going to see more of the president on pri
threat and the way many people talk about it like opening up dams and that sort of thing. it s always a threat, but it never happens, that s what i m saying. i think they do happen to a certain extent that we don t know about. there s a lot of effort we don t know about. not just a connection with this incident or this problem, but the attempts at cyber warfare between many countries and many cyber groups is always ongoing, actually. okay. how is the u.s. security likely handling these terror threats? i think they are trying to look at, obviously the conventional terror threats of whether somebody would do any type of a bombing type attack or attack on our aviation or other infrastructure, as well as these cyber threats. i think the difference is that in a way it s harder to really know where the cyber threat might come from and who s helping in the effort to use