found out what happened and recommended answers, most of which have been taken. and we haven t been subject to a major attack, foreign attack since. this time america was under attack from within. all of these members of congress were potential victims. all of them. republicans, too. and we need to find out what happened. the senate rejected an independent commission, unfortunately. the house is doing its best. and i think that if they can find the facts, and i agree with mike. the meta data will be useful in narrowing down who meadows to, maybe who the president spoke to this day. this was not the normal course of business. it will be interesting to see what happens with an executive privilege claim given where the calls were made and who made them. but at any rate, we have to know what happened. and then let voters understand that before they cast their vote. both of you, whether at the end of this, given the head
notably you are not calling for an end to the 2001 measure. i want foam listen people to li reasoning. 2001 that was obama bin laden. you think there is some use for that? yes. i have called for a dramatic revision on the 2001 authorization. we had one last year that would have narrowed it down a lot including specifying that no president could use it to take military action against a sovereign nation. the white house didn t like it, they didn t want their hands tied so they spoke out against it and we couldn t move. but i m very interested in narrowing down 2001. it s been used for too long in too many places against too many groups that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack. however, isis and al qaeda still pose a threat to the united states. i know the president wants to say there s no more threat from ice spits that s not what our military believes. i would like to draft a very narrow authorization that would be focused on isis and al-qaeda and it would have a much more