prove. continuing now with our factor special fightsd the terror threat. does president obama even have a strategy to defeat isis? recently i spoke with colonel tony shaffer and dr. michael reuben. both have concerns about how the president is handling isis. so, colonel i understand that you have new information about afghanistan and isis. right. what is it? bill, basically isis is on the modify. not surprisingly. what they are doing in afghanistan is quite brilliant. much like they partnered with the baath party in northern iraq to go about how to understand how to dismantle parts of the country. they have partnered with the higg. a terrorist organization a guy named hekmati a war lord given them information. my sources tell me they have control of five northern provinces in afghanistan plus they are now taking over the drug trade in the
hearing from the afghan government who is aware of all of this. the pentagon is down playing. this they are trying to mobilize even some of the taliban. it will be interesting to see how that shakes down. mr. aruba bebb, i am fairly indicting the obama administration for being appear apathetic in the face of the growing threat you have to acknowledge it even if mr. earnst plays it down. do you understand the apathy mr. reuben? i think the basic problem, bill, the fight against isis is one step forward and two steps back. the white house and the pentagon will only allow the reporting of the one step forward and so we don t recognize that we are losing this war and that we refuse to recalibrate our strategy in order to win. they don t acknowledge that they are not going to acknowledge that if i had the president on or even the joint chief of staffs. they wouldn t acknowledge that last night there was a late night meeting in the white house. to come up with some kind of
admission is free for family members of september 11th victims for headlines log on to fox news.com. war foes. now back to the o reilly factor. impact segment tonight.nt a group of veterans against isis is about to launch a combat mission to fight jihadists on their own. joining us is sean roe founder of the group and former army sergeant who did serve in iraq. mr. roe, let me get this straight, you guys got a group of all americans mostly veterans, mostly combat guys and you re gonna go on your own to syria to fight isis? is that it? well, our primary mission is to liberate iraq under from under isis control. how many guys you got? we got nearly two dozen veterans right now and i m talking to a lot more recently. all right. but two dozen is not going to liberate anything from anything. and if you go over with just
not a different world. see all the my grants coming over from africa? did you miss it? it s the exact same world. you need to admit that you were wrong by saying we needed to overthrow assad. i didn t say anything about assad. i had no analysis on assad at all. didn t say anything about assad? i find that hard to believe. you have to go back and check. i know monica has. this was a talking point. we have to get rid of assad. never mind the fact that isis. you are bringing up stuff that wasn t brought up here. i m making the point that you guys are wrong all the time. things are going so well right now aren t they,. i will give monica the last word. obama causes every single problem in the world. powers, give your cohort the last word. when you have a commander and chief in the united states that is weak or perceived as weak, have you advancing enemies and chaos around the world. we know this from history. now what we see is isis is raging across the middle
expressly ruled out having boots on the ground against the best military advice that he is getting. wait, i don t understand why the 60 nation coalition couldn t each kick in 5,000 troops okay, that s 300,000. did i that right in my head without a calculator, all right? 300,000, right? 5,000 times 60, that s 300,000. okay. wouldn t that overwhelm isis anywhere in the middle east? that would be great if that were to happen. you can t expect saudi arabia and united arab elm rites to kick in troops. why not? they are just not going to do it because they need american leadership. if there is a coalition to fight these savages and all we are asking is 5,000 troops from each country which isn t a lot. wouldn t that overwhelm isis. in theory, yes that s not going to happen unless we do something to galvanize a sunni revolt against isis. if 300,000 troops were assigned to this task believe me the sunnies and everybody else would get on that team real fast. mr. that furry is it fa