many states, which by the way is verifiably not true, it just didn t happen. his lawyers say this, quote, in brooks judgment, donald trump won the electoral college and should be serving his second term as president of the united states. brooks welcomes public debate with anyone who ignorantly claims otherwise. okay, he is wrong. right. so if he is perpetrating a lie on behalf of his constituents, that s his argument, two things could be true, one, he actually believes it or two he doesn t. so let s start with the he doesn t because that seems i think a lot of members of congress to fall into that one. if he doesn t believe it but he s perpetrating it on behalf of his constituents, is he possibly protected. there s many times lawmakers may be perpetrating something that s not true on quote unquote behalf of their participants. i don t know what it is, if he s dangerously delusional or dishonest, either way, i don t