channels are being used, which is exactly what you would like to have happen. you would like people to have a if you see something, say something philosophy. what they re trying to do is say, the process is the philosophy. when you cannot attack the underlying facts that are being stated, if they have been corroborated not only the rough transcript of the president s phone call himself, the president s own statement and other people, at least over a dozen witnesses, what do you do? you try to go over the way in which the vehicle of information was actually traveling. so what you re seeing here time and again is not only with john talking about the impugning of integrity of one s loyalty, but also the idea, why are you not asking questions about the underlying substance of it? why are you asking the leaking to the media if again the idea of trying to shoot the message as opposed to talking about the underlying complaints. and all of this right now tells us, time and again, we have the s
john bolton didn t last that much longer in the administration. i m sure that was totally a coincidence. here is what is important about the washington post story in addition to the details from the story and we re hearing today. again this narrative is starting to lay itself out. we now know july 25th, which we always knew wasn t the only time this conversation was had. now we know that there were other meetings and know what was happening on july 10th. it is reasonable to assume there was potentially prior to that there were more conversation. it didn t just occur to someone one day, hey, let s do this. you have to suspect that he would have trump i mean would have had this idea in his head right from the time they got a new prime minister in ukraine. and what is the defense of this? what are people republicans on the hill and republicans in the white house saying other than attacking those who are making these allegations in depositions and impugning patriotism, et ceter
banks to return about $12 billion directly to people they treated. the one of the sort of recurring themes tonight and exchanges with other people is a feeling, and i think senator klobuchar said this, that in talking about kind of need for structural change, not raising big money with big dollar donors, that you re fundamentally kind of impugning either the motives or the vision of the other candidates. right? they want to say look, we agree on the problems, we disagree on the solutions, it doesn t mean i m some sort of sellout. what do you say to that? i think it s the case that nearly everybody on that stage has said they won t take corporate pac money. which tells me that everybody on that stage knows that it matters where your money comes from. i made the decision when i decided to run for president that i was going to run a different kind of campaign. wait a second, though. as senator you didn t make that decision. and you raised a lot of money and you had a lot of cash on
they are at politics. they are better at that than they are at policy. when he runs against colin kaepernick for president he ll have a great issue. i don t hear any democratic presidential candidate talking about the betsy ross flag. they are talking about truly we are talking about health care. they re talking aboutng infrastructure, all the things. laura: why are they not denouncing the anti-americanisml why is it not every republican denouncing the president s tweets? laura: they know he s not a racist. what he s saying it s racist given his history. laura: litany, litany litany. we re not doing litany. compare it to the candidate beto o rourke. what we saw in north carolina was almost an impromptu nuremberg rally. laura: standing up for the flag versus impugning americans? democratic candidates problems is not with trump. it s with the american people.
little and they are very good at it. they are better that than they are politics. they are better at that than the art policy. when he runs against colin kaepernick for president, he ll have a great issue. i don t hear any democratic presidential candidate talking about the betsy ross flag. they are talking about truly we are talking about health care. they re talking about infrastructure, all the things. laura: why are they not denouncing the anti-americanism? why is it not every republican denouncing the president s tweets question marks. do they know he s not a racist. what he s saying it s racist, given his history. laura: whitney, let me, let me. were not doing lately. compared to the kennedy beto o rourke. we saw north carolina was almost an impromptu nuremberg rally. laura: standing up for the flag versus impugning americans?