happen, but if it does it would not be a shock but it would be a surprise. on the other hand, this point of severing cases is really complicated in georgia because mr chesebro s rights under georgia voll. i because mr chesebro s rights under georgia voll. . .- because mr chesebro s rights under georgia voll. .. i am ust auoin to under georgia voll. .. i am ust going to jumping fl under georgia voll. .. i am ust going to jumping quickly h going to jumping quickly because going tojumping quickly because we are seeing the former president come to speak. if you challenge an election you should be able to challenge an election. i thought the election was a rigged election, a election. i should have my right to do that. we have seen people over the years do the same thing whether it is hillary clinton or stacey abram or many others. when you have the great freedom to challenge you can have very dishonest elections. what has taken place here is a travesty ofjustice. we did nothing wrong.
that they make up votes out of nothing, which would clearly be an improperand nothing, which would clearly be an improper and illegal request and that is why, i think, if this case does go to trial, this case does go to trial, this case does go to trial, this case and the pedal one that was just mentioned part of the issue will be does a iurv of the issue will be does a jury believe that was a legitimate and reasonable request or was it actually a criminal proposal that these officials engage in some type officials engage in some type of fraud to make it look like the former president won that election in 2020 and that is what a jury will have to settle. what a “my will have to settle. ~ ., ., ., what a “my will have to settle. a, ., ., i. what a “my will have to settle. ., ., , settle. morgan, when do you see a u settle. morgan, when do you see a jury coming settle. morgan, when do you see a jury coming down settle. morgan, when do you see a jury coming down on settle.
the other ones too. they are doing election interference. there has never been anything like it in our country before. this is their way of campaigning. this is one instance but you have three other instances. it is election interference so i want to thank you for being here. we have done nothing wrong at all and we have every single right to challenge an election that we think is dishonest, that we think is dishonest, that we think is dishonest, that we think is very dishonest. so, thank you all very much and i will see you very soon. mil will see you very soon. all right. those will see you very soon. all right. those comments from the former president as he gets back onto his plane. congressman davis, do you believe that this was interference, this indictment? no. obviously the president and his team went a lot further than what any of us wish that he would have done. i was there on january he would have done. i was there onjanuary 6. i was going onto the floors. i was evacuated w
criminal charges. he left and came back to his plane and is flying back to bed mr new jersey and he had advertised he would give an interview to news max and that might be pushed back because he will be in the air but that is what we are expecting to see from the former president. he delivered brief words before getting on the plane saying i have nothing wrong. you should be able to challenge election results. and he thanked everyone for the support he has been getting so that is what we have got right now when we have congressman davis and brian lanza with us. brian and congressman davis, we can talk a bit about the political impact of this and, brian, i want to get your thoughts first because you were watching the debate on the stage very closely last night. do you think that the former president was indeed the winner? he was not even there.