technical problems. what about these remarks? intended to inflame or provoke xu discussion? neither. consistent attacking the united states, they all say essentially the same thing, that the united states has continued to drone, bomb, invade, occupy, imprison and torture countless people in the muslim world, and that people in that part of the world and muslims who identify with it have concluded that the only way to make that stop, the only way to fulfill their notions of justice is to bring violence to the united states so that americans can see the effects of that which they re causing in other parts of the world, and i think we need to face up to what it is that we re doing to inflame this problem and continue to mode vat the anti-american sentiment that causes terrorism in the first place. terrorism and causation are two very different things? the fact of the matter, you
where it will take a long-term to get the power back? what have you heard? reporter: we have heard three or four days before cell phone service. shepard: what is the situation if you go a mile from the area? reporter: the closer you get to the water, it is bad. the rescuers are going block by block. if you are a couple with young children they are putting people over their shoulder and carrying them out. so, three or four feet of water is enough to strand, really, imprison a lot of people here. shepard: it is, the very young and the very old. thank you, steve, on the coast of maryland. it never ends. we got word from washington, dc, the federal government office are open tomorrow and people who work for the federal government are expected to be there.
situation that his or her act amounts to disregard for human life or indifference to the consequences of that act. it s important to remember and focus on those terms and not to treat them cavalierly as some might by saying, oh, well, it just happened. and, oh, well, if it weren t for dr. murray, someone else may have been involved. i categorically dissociate myself from those types of statements. this is not a question about what might have happened or what if someone else had been involved if not for dr. murray. that is an insult to the medical
probation. the request for probation under the rules of court is denied. the question then becomes, what is the appropriate period of incarceration. the court has many options. including hybrid-type sentences as authorized by the realignment act of 2011 and straight sentencing. this court does not have the legal authority to actually send and imprison dr. murray in state prison. i do not have that legal authority, and i certainly am going to follow the law in that regard. the legislature of this state signed a realignment act that declares certain offenses, while felonies, not to be served in
some responsibility, some remorse. why give probation to someone who is offended by the whole idea that that person is each before is even before the court? you can t have probation when there isn t an acknowledgment of rehabilitation and responsibility. and regrettably, dr. murray doesn t have any of them. dr. murray certainly is statutorily eligible for probation. i looked value yaptly valiantly for efforts to satisfy myself that while dr. murray was legally eligible for probation, he was suitable for probation. and i really didn t become convinced i could find any. dr. murray is eligible for