for things how is that lying? maybe that s not the lying. how is that a lie. i call it that because of the imper cal evidence. it s a fact check. there s so many instances. it s hard to pick one. you want to go through the 900 or so they have put together? the record setting hundreds of instances. okay, we can litigate that if you want. here are some of the facts i see. the stock market is up 10ish per cent. michael is talking president trump telling lies. hold on a second. we disagree about that. i don t think he s telling lies. you want to litigate that during this segment it s a matter of opinion. maybe the lies have been an effect of the stock markets rising. wall street thinks they are getting a great handout.
it s been a long time. we haven t heard him talk like this. people like mike in his administration have been saying in a long time. it is clearly in terms of imper cal data to bolster the president s opinion. it is strong argument. you were talking earlier about how tough he was and how much he talked about urban america. i don t think he is dipping into that as deeply as he could. my question to the president and white house is when are you going to detroit? and he didn t even mention detroit in this very lengthy interview with the new york times yesterday. i think that is a fair point. let s get right to the comments we mentioned earlier this talking to some people in detroit. take a listen to this. racial tensions won t get better. they get worse. because people will feel as if
and so they believed that iraq had these weapons, but they didn t and there was never proof they did. was it the fact there was no proof that led to your vote? were you objecting to the rush to judgment without imper cal proof. al-qaeda was the ones that invaded our sovereignty, killed our citizens and took down the world trade center on that terrible day and i was convinced we had the evidence that afghanistan an the taliban were heidii i hiding al-qaeda. when the white house came to us with wrairaq, they said you havo trust us. i said i m a member of congress. we have to take this vote very seriously and i m not going vote to go into this nation and put our men and women at risk as well as the civilians there, as
and so they believed that iraq had these weapons, but they didn t and there was never proof they did. was it the fact there was no proof that led to your vote? were you objecting to the rush to judgment without imper cal proof. al-qaeda was the ones that invaded our sovereignty, killed our citizens and took down the world trade center on that terrible day and i was convinced we had the evidence that afghanistan an the taliban were hiding al-qaeda. when the white house came to us with iraq, they said you have to trust us. i said i m a member of congress. we have to take this vote very seriously and i m not going vote to go into this nation and put our men and women at risk as well as the civilians there, as well as the reputation in the world and not to mention we re in the financial problems we re
half in a 20-step process. who exactly do you have to turn out? who exactly do you have to target? it s imper cal questions that have em per cal answers. look at the pattern. as the age groups get older president obama does work. he does great with younger people but he s losing among older people in florida. look at the latest numbers from florida, same pattern. same story. obama is winning overall in each poll but his support is totally dependent on specific age groups. you see the same thing again. the same pattern in the data from fox news s latest polling. president obama s support is high among younger voters but it drops off and mr. romney is winning with older voters. if you re a political technician and trying to win the state of florida for your can understand, this polling pattern is not just an interesting fact about how this state is likely to vote.