charged, he s gotten with the exception of roger stone who hasn t had his day in court yet. he only brings cases when he has unimpeachable evidence he knows he can win and that maybe for people that haven t been charged, he didn t feel he had that quality of evidence. very quickly to kim s point. president trump is far from out of the woods. so the with president appears to have made a number of misleading statements about trump tower moscow when he was a candidate for president of the united states. now, it s not a crime for a candidate for office to lie. at the same time the russians knew he was lying and so he may have been compromised in a way that has important national security imp lblications and co lead to a impeachment removal from office. what s different than two or three hours ago? we know mueller s investigation is over.
instance, with richard nixon what really made him begin to decline and endanger his impeachment and removal was not when the democratic opposition came out for impeachment removal but when members of his own party did. in early 1974 you had people like ed brook, james buckley, the conservative senator from new york, others one by one said that richard nixon can no longer serve. he has to be removed either through impeachment or resignation. contrast that with nowadays how many republican senators, for instance, have come out and said this is a president of our party who cannot function. that s a fair point, michael. shane, that s why i go back to the end of the day, the voters have to have a say in this. i think the midterms look, i think i think at the end of the day, elected republicans are not going to change their view publicly until they feel pain politically. and losing the senate would be real pain because they don t expect it. yeah, the year plus now of
called trump impeachment removal or conviction. the only required reading is a book titled the case for impeachment. brandon jones is a correspondent for campus reform.org and a senior at san diego state university. he is also the chairman of the college republicans at sdfu. thank you so much for joining us, brandon. hi, ainsley, thanks for having me. ainsley: thank you. what one of the courses you could sign up for at your school. this is something we see all the time leadership institute campus reform. what i take away from it san diego state sends to be accepted ago very clear message. i think the dangerous part of it is that they are making a very strong claim that the president has sort of committed crimes of treason or bribery and that he is, you know, been allegedly accused of violating the article 2 section 4 of the constitution. ainsley: it s not even sort
impeachment removal or conviction. and the case for impeachment. brandon jones, a senior at san diego state university, the college republicans joined us this morning. thank you for joining us. just from the description of the course alone does it seem fair to you? we see this type of stuff at the leadership institute campus reform and it goes to show you what is happening on college campuses today. this course has a clear message and i receive that message loud and clear and we are fighting back against it. heather: we did receive a comment from the school and this is what they say, quote, this presents an overall framework of impeachment, removal or criminal investigation of a president rather than focusing on donald
owner with a multimillion dollar fine for conduct, quote, detrimental to the league. the nfl looking for jones to replay legal cost after contesting a 5-year contract extension and clashed over ezekiel elliott avenue suspension from domestic violence allegations. a course dedicated strictly to removing donald trump from the white house, students will get one credit for it from impeachment removal or conviction. prof. john cleary will teach the criminal justice program, required reading, a book called the case for impeachment. let us know what you think about that. after day one of the liberations the supreme court is split with the government employees should be forced to pay union fees. the issue is my right to choice which with my first