they would not. it s a case by case basis. the european ambassador to the european union was directed initially not to appear, but because the testimony, republicans believed, would be favorable to the president, he was encouraged to testify. we could see it on a case by case basis. the administration says if it does have the opportunity to cross exam a lot of these witnesses itself, that it would be a more likely to cooperate. republicans though have said, they re not going to be cooperative, really, no matter what because democrats are set on doing this, regardless of what the opposition says. neil: and a report from garrett. thank you, my friend, always good seeing you. in the meantime, the white house is putting the ball, as garrett said, in nancy pelosi s court before they consider cooperating with them on impeachment matters. former white house press second and i might point out the biggest star right now on dancing with the stars, he keeps
impeachment matters, we where entitled to that information and i hope we get it. so this is just the latest high crime and misdemeanor from this president. it is critical that we get all of the information laid out before the american people if we re going to get a reasonable hearing in the senate. because impeachment without removal is perhaps worse than nothing. it is it meets our psychological needs but doesn t remove a president who has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. and this has been your position since 2017. what specifically is it that you believe has caused that number to go up in the last 24 hours when we look at that letter by seven freshmen who are from swing districts, who have national security expertise, what specifically about this incident has been a game changer? well, first, it is how many straws on the camel s back.
we re back. republican chairman reince priebus, that s really his name, declared open season on hillary clinton earlier today on msnbc, responding to a question from andrea mitchell about whether bill clinton s impeachment matters. in the political fights of the 1990s should be fought again in 2016. here is what priebus said. is that a legitimate issue, rehashing the 90s if hillary clinton becomes a candidate for president? i think everything is on the table. i don t see how someone just gets a pass on anything, i mean, especially in today s politics. so i think we re going to have a truckload of opposition research on hillary clinton and some things may be old and some things might be new. hillary clinton provides a lot of opportunity for us. well, his comment are the
we re back. republican chairman reince priebus, that s really his name, declared open season on hillary clinton earlier today on msnbc, responding to a question from andrea mitchell about whether bill clinton s impeachment matters. in the political fights of the 1990s should be fought again in 2016. here is what priebus said. is that a legitimate issue, rehashing the 90s if hillary clinton becomes a candidate for president? i think everything is on the table. i don t see how someone just gets a pass on anything, i mean, especially in today s politics. so i think we re going to have a truckload of opposition research on hillary clinton and some things may be old and some things might be new. hillary clinton provides a lot of opportunity for us. well, his comment are the