donald trump is formidable. laura: democrats growing self awareness about the weakness of their field helped propel the current impeachment frenzy. peter strzok had his strategy in august of 2016. comey and brennan had an insurance policy, they thought. guess what. that failed too. now pelosi and adam schiff think they may have an insurance policy for a third shot of knocking out trump. it will be another swing and miss. you will see liberal pundits posing as tv anchors this week delivering the blow-by-blow during the impeachment hearings. their 4 rowed brow is to convince you this is all serious. this is their furrowed
legitimate, does the white house or the state department or the executive branch have any recourse that wouldou be wise to take legally here? or would that just look so bad? there is the politics but also in terms of the law, you can t go into court and to say this is illegitimate, it s totally inconsistent with our constitutional traditions. we need an injunction. the courts would rightly throw that out, we are going to have to see this very important process unfold and there s probably going to be some subpoena enforcement on the house, we will have to wait to see about that.su laura: it s great to see you as always. the media and political class have hit the impeachment frenzy from just about every angle but few were asking the obvious question what could this travesty mean for the future of our republic? here to answer that question former acting u.s. attorney general matt whitaker. i have been thinking about thiss
legitimate, does the white house or the state department or the executive branch have any recourse that would be wise to take legally here? or would that just look so bad? there is the politics but also in terms of the law, you can t go into court and to say this is illegitimate, it s totally inconsistent with our constitutional traditions. we need an injunction. the courts would rightly throw that out, we are going to have to see this very important process unfold and there s probably going to be some subpoena enforcement on the house, we will have to wait to see about that. laura: it s great to see you as always. the media and political class have hit the impeachment frenzy from just about every angle but few were asking the obvious question what could this travesty mean for the future of our republic? here to answer that question former acting u.s. attorney general matt whitaker. i have been thinking about this
testimony happening friday, the collusion between the whistle-blower and schiff s committee could be far worse than we previously know. we told friday the whistle-blower did not disclose that he had met with schiff s staff before filing the complaint that sparked to the whole impeachment frenzy. they are now telling fox that the intel ig had no explanation for an 18-day periodbetween trul with the ukraine and the whistle blower filing his or her complaint on august 12. it is during that period that the whistle-blower contracted schiff to decide to go to the intel ig to file the complaint. sources are also saying the whistle-blower did not disclose to the ig any congressional contact that he or she may have had. so, here i m going to remind you that adam schiff is the only one has the ability to
collusion between the whistle-blower and shifts committee could be far worse than we previously know. if we told friday the whistle-blower did not disclose that he had med with schiff as a chef before filing the complaint that sparked to the whole impeachment frenzy. there are now telling fox that the intel ig had no explanation. for an 18 day. with ukraine, and the whistle-blower filing his or her complaints on august 12th. now, during that period that the whistle-blower contracted schiff to decide to go to the intel ig to file the complaint. sources are also saying the whistle-blower did not disclose to the ig any congressional contact that he or she may have had. so, here i m going to remind you, that adam schiff is the only one has the ability to relieve the full transcript from last week s hearing.