i find the impeachment discussion really troubling. to me, that should be incredibly simple. i understand there s a political calculation to it, i understand that. but he committed a crime. if you can go to jail, you ought to be impeached. we have to sneak in a break. breaking news from one of report mueller s star witnesses. stay with us. if your adventure. keeps turning into unexpected bathroom trips. you may have overactive bladder, or oab.
into this core question of whether the integrity of our electoral process is being threatened. i think that the mueller report makes that very clear and it would be very helpful if we could come together around that core issue and not stay in blue versus red camps as we ve just increasingly seen in american electoral politics. and because it seems like the nation is so politically divided, do you think we ll get anything new out of this and could mueller s testimony really be a game changer in the impeachment discussion? i don t think it s going to change the views of his supporters. i do think it can, if it s done deftly and carefully, and focusing on some core messages, there should be some repetition because people can t hold multiple pieces of information in their minds. i do think it could shift some sort of legitimacy to the congress in this oversight piece. we re so far afield from what the constitution really envisioned which is each branch checking the other branches to ta
the question is not if. you re probably right about that in terms of it winding its way through the court system but when. because that is the problem the democrats are facing right now. as of right now they don t have the documents, the witnesses, and if you look at the white house counsel, pat cipollone s letter to jerry nadler a couple weeks ago, i don t think that s gotten enough attention because he s essentially saying article 1 of the constitution is not relevant and is not in effect right now because congress doesn t have oversight powers over the executive, contrary to what article one actually says and you congress have to have legislation or an agenda to get any information the courts rejected that, right? they laughed at it. yes. but they re continuing to do this. this is why we re having this impeachment discussion at all, it isn t the obstruction in the mueller report, it s the obstruction going on right now. the question again is how long, because right now it s ve
but no matter what the evidences it doesn t matter about the mueller report, about barr s testimony. it certainly doesn t matter about don mcgahn and all the other thing she is trying to use as distractions from the impeachment discussion. all this is about is taking it out on president trump. she knows this is a political loser. she s trying her best to bury it under the rug. harris: what do you think of and some of the things that maybe she and the president have said about this? because he genuinely seemed to be surprised when she said he had engaged in a cover-up. josh: i think the most interesting interchange was a couple of weeks ago when she was going to go down there and talk about infrastructure, but before we went such a do a press conference to just sort of slam the president. harris: you don t think that was accidental? [laughter] josh: i don t think she thought he would react the way he did. harris: really? come on! melissa: you don t walk to a camera and say
trump districts because he won, as well s. that the number at the moment when she comes back to the beltway and washington, d.c. that she is looking to see how many might say, okay, i do support impeachment? there s one right now of the 31. yeah, no. i think you are absolutely right to ask that question, richard. they probably are watching that. i think speaker pelosi is astute politician and is very cognizant of what s going on in her caucus and what she needs to do to try and gomp right now in terms of legislation but also to keep control of the house in 2020. obviously she has an interest in changing over power in the white house and the impeachment discussion is part of the both of them. she looks of the district that is went for trump and who has that to hold on to that seat in