military take an oath to defend the instituticonstitution and ol orders. they have a duty to report perceived conduct up the chain of command. more crimes, rules of engagement, abuse of rank or power. so as general hurtling said in conclusion as a soldier, vinman acted as he should. your top questions. first of all, will onbolton testify in the house. the house wants him thursday. his lawyers said he won t go without a subpoena. if he gets one, will he obey or fight? second, will there be any new developments strong enough to move members off party lines? third, will the white house identify and execute a koo coordinated defense strategy. up until now, it s been shifting almost by the hour, almost by the trump tweet. now this is real and the question is is will the white house come together and come up with a coordinated coherent impeachment defense strategy.
avoidance, do you have a sense there is a single impeachment defense strategy coming out of this white house or not? one of the things that s most striking we have a little more on this later in the hour as republicans are voicing their concern with more panic and more leaks is that you have mulvaney trying to say maybe there was a quid pro quo and it s cool, and then saying no, i didn t say that. you have pence basically saying i don t care how evasive i look, evasive looks better than admitting a quid pro quo and then these other officials we reported at the top of the hour that say, yeah, there was one. a couple of threads are being woven together. one is this idea that there s no quid pro quo at all. i don t know what you re talking about. there was no quid pro quo. then there s the idea there s always a bit of pressure and pressure brought to bear in diplomacy and this is one of those swayings and it s of no moment. then there was quid pro quo but it wasn t necessarily about
t the president wouldn t even go as far to say the president is still his personal attorney even though giuliani made clear to one of my colleagues that, yes, he still thinks he is. the fact that he won t be representing the president on ukraine really tells you all you need to know because it makes clear he s not going to be playing a significant role in this impeachment defense strategy coming out of the white house. going to be a liability? maybe a little late for that, kaitlan. thank you very much. i appreciate it. will the president s bad week keep getting worse with his personal lawyer under investigation and four more key people to testify next week? john dean, mia love, max boot all weigh in next. what does it take, to call yourself an explorer? traveling to the darkest depths of the ocean. pushing beyond the known horizon. passing through. hey mom, can we get fro-yo? , yeah, fro-yo. yes. the all-new 2020 ford explorer st.
on television defending him for the last two years through it all. instead the president is now questioning whether or not rudy giuliani is going to be a liability for him, something that people have been telling the president for weeks now, before all of this happened about his clients being arrested, telling the president they didn t think rudy giuliani was the right person to represent him in this impeachment fight that he seems increasingly likely headed for. the president now seems to be starting to heed that, and that was evident today in that the president wouldn t even go as far to say that rudy giulani is still his personal attorney even though giuliani made clear to one of my colleagues that, yes, he still thinks he is. the fact that he won t be representing the president on ukraine really tells you all you need to know because it makes clear he s not going to be playing a significant role in this impeachment defense strategy coming out of the white house. going to be a lia
who exactly will be the person running this impeachment defense strategy. there are people who say it s jared cush nekushner and the president s senior adviser and son-in-law, as with the gowdy situation if the president can know convinced of it and then they ll move forward with that idea. the white house and the president s campaign working to schedule some of these rallies and some aides say they believe that s because the president needs a way to channel some of his frustration that they see him expressing not only there in the roosevelt room and also on twitter over this and that includes a rally in minneapolis overnight and another one that was scheduled pretty close at the last minute for friday night. the question is going to be going forward that aides feel that this is focusing too much on the impeachment inquiry and needing him to lash out during an event that was not obviously related to impeachment. so that s really the question going forward, but yes, erin, you re seeing