Thats the preamble. Lets give you the state of play as it exists right now. We have roughly, trying to squint over the board, 8. 6, 8. 7 million votes to leave. 8. 2 million to remain. Bottom line here, is that the leave camp leads the stay camp 51 to 48 . And trend is towards the leave camp. How about the results here on americas Financial Markets . Youre looking on that on the lefthand side of your screen. Almost call it a bloodbath. The dow will open tomorrow morning if it stood right now, down 500 points, nearly 3 . Go to sky news for a second for another result coming in. 87,000 bristol votes for remain by a comfortable margin. 50,000 votes. This is nigel faraj. The dawn is breaking on an independent United Kingdom. [cheering] just caught him there. That is nigel faraj, one of thed leaders of the leave campaign. He conceded Stay Campaign would win. Not so, nigel. I dare to dream dawn is coming up on independent u. K. Look at more of this. [applause] we are fought against multinati
Self driving cars, driver using autopilot in a tesla model s. Not only big for travel but the big friendly giant among movies hitting theaters, a preview of the weekends top movies. So much for the selloff in the weeks of the british vote to leave the European Union. The tao and the s p 500 have recovered nearly all the losses from that vote. Look at the action this morning, futures in the us point to a slightly lower open off one 4 , futures down 39 points. In europe we are watching markets trade in positive territory although mixed trading we have seen for most of the session. The cac quarante in france, the for the in london up 3 10 of 1 . Markets are higher and the hang seng closed for trading today. Green arrows across the board. All of that coming up and there she is, foxbusiness networks Dagan Mcdowell is here, professor of business and economics and radio talkshow host daniel webb. This is going to be good stuff. Good to have you here. You see richard and david next to each oth
We are a big federal government. Like you all we can do come we all have to do as local governments, you have to do 20 things at a time every day. The same applies for us. We want to make sure we give you the tools to help give your folks back home information about the process. I will turn it over to simon. Before we do that, any questions before we go to the Refugee Resettlement . Thank you so much. Let me go ahead and introduce the next three panelists. Simon henshaw is a career officer at the u. S. Foreign service. Currently serving as Principal Deputy assistant secretary of the beer of population, refugees, and migration. The bureau of population. Barbara strack to my left is a joint u. S. Citizen and citizenship and Immigration Services as chief of the Refugee Affairs division. She manages the refugee core and Headquarters Staff to support u. S. Refugee admissions and admissions program. She worked in both the public and private sectors directing a project on immigration at the N
That could be maimed, there is constraints made on contributions to candidates and parties but it allowed expenditures to be unlimited. So what we have is a system that we still have today where theres a lot of money that wants to make its voice heard, that wants to it express their view and they often need money to express that view, but then there are limits to the way that money can be expressed through candidates. So candidates, they are are interested in having one of the. Its like taking someone who is thursday and telling them you can have as much water as you want but you can only have it a teaspoon at a time. So the candidates of spending a lot of time raising money because they want to have that money to run for the election, the we have a lot of people who want to give the money but it is restrained and whats they can give it because of the potential corrupt influence. So we have a system where where there is a lot of money in the system but it is hard and candidates end up
Live within the constitutional con strastraints of buckley and thats whats led to some of this sort of starts and fits of reform. The other thing i think buckley has changed, or what would be different if there hadnt been buckley, is that probably Political Parties would be much stronger and much more in control of their candidates, much more influential over their candidates and so that would probably be a big difference as well. Yeah, i was going to ask you about what do you think the impact would have been on parties . Can you give us a reason why do you think the parties would be stronger if, under that scenario . Well, the parties are a source of resources, of brand name, and so if candidates are less free to raise their own resources, make their own brand, then they have to rely on the parties more. And, therefore, youre going to see more Party Discipline and you see, you know, more powerful parties in the u. S. Like you see in european countries. There wouldnt be a ted cruz. He