much faster than most conventional weapons. a traditional cruise missile would travel less than the speed of sound, but a hypersonic cruise missile would travel much faster. that is roughly a mile per second. in addition, a hypersonic weapon is also manoeuvrable, because it is flying in the atmosphere, it is flying in the atmosphere, it has wings, it can use aerodynamic forces to manoeuvre, it can glide, it can dive, and that makes it harder to predict where it is going to 90, to predict where it is going to go, harderto to predict where it is going to go, harder to detect and harder to stop. go, harder to detect and harder to sto -. ., go, harder to detect and harder to sto. ., go, harder to detect and harder tosto. ., , go, harder to detect and harder to sto. ., , to stop. how powerful is it? how much to stop. how powerful is it? how much damage - to stop. how powerful is it? how much damage can - to stop. how powerful is it? how much damage can it. to stop. how powerful is it? | h
in the atmosphere, it has wings, it can use aerodynamic forces to manoeuvre, it can glide, it can dive, and that makes it harder to predict where it is going to go, harder to detect and harder to stop. how powerful is it? how much damage can it do, depending on what you load it with? it depends. it is a whole class of things, it can be very large, relatively small, it depends on the warhead. that fast, you can produce effects from the energy of the weapon itself, you can use the kinetic energy of the vehicle to supplement the impact effects. how do hypersonic capabilities differ from country to country? we are hearing about north korea and the us both having the capability, but i find it hard to believe they have the same level of capability, surely not? we don t know much about the north koreans, but i would guess it is not very sophisticated. the leaders in hypersonics right now are the united states, china and russia. other countries have also worked in the field. england has a long