them, they didn t vote for them. it is an unfair standard. if they are willing to overlook that and take the entire package. the american people want reform. he was supposed to drain the swamp, be bring in the best. he sweats talent. maybe it s not drained yet. ethical problems. maybe it is not drainable. but the system the way it is right now, the american people don t like it. the reason why he will win reelection is that he represents a change and a possible disruption to that system. the system can t be disrupted because we evacuated most of the trump loyalists out of the white house. we don t allow access to the trump loyalists coming into the white house. so maybe the system itself is so powerful, maybe the immunological system is it will
counteract some of these stories. getting hit with a disproportionate number of negative stories and a tremendous amount of leaks, much more than we saw with the obama administration and the bush administration. he can go to anybody. cory lewandowski, brian lanza, jason miller, he may go to those guys, made go to a new group of people. if he calls, people are going to be responsive. he s the president. he has a whole team of people that helped bring him in the white house that he has an enormous amount of respect for any trust. i think some combination of those men and women are there and ready to serve him. i think the most unique thing about what s going on right now is that he s a disruptive change agent and that swamp has a very intense immunological system.
intense immunological system. they don t want him in there, they are trying to reject him in every way they can. it will be interesting to see what happens. kimberly: you think this is something he can turn around and relatively short order with the right people in place? last week we did the sold conference at skybridge. we did a survey. we had a collection of different people. universally, at the table, every person more or less said they thought the president could correct this. he s got a big opportunity to control the narrative, one great thing about the presidency, it sets the news cycle every day. he s a great communicator and people genuinely like the president. that s one short year ago i was in albuquerque, new mexico, with him. 8,000 people in the civic center, 9,000 people waiting outside. he is going to iowa in the next five or ten days.
and targets it for destruction. you get your immunological system parading in and destroying cancer cells. bill: technically then, the treatment feeds off of the cancer sells and essentially consumes them or eats it until it is dead? exactly. they make, they change the virus genetically the scientists do, so it will only thrive in a cancer cell, feeding off nutrients of the cancer cell and killing it. it s a poison pill for a cancer cell. it is called targeted therapy. it is part of targeted therapy. definitely a wave of the future. to take virus, cancer viruses to get them to go into these cells kill the cells. here is the key part bill. get the immune system to recognize the cell as a foreign invader, because cancer hides in the body. our immune system ignores it. that is why it is growing. bill: so you leave the good cells functioning and fine and you go after the bad stuff. make them seem like they re
about this. every day when i ll take a history and physical from a patient, i say what are your allergies, they mention a food and i think is it real or an intolerance and something that happened in your childhood you haven t had since and you will not go near the food, real allergies, mean your immunological system is going haywire when you see a certain food and most people it doesn t agree with their stomach or got a rash, it was never documented and went to the wrong signed of doctor. and it is only an allergist, taking a careful history, doing the right kind of tests that can determine this and i think the study is right on. gregg: it is overdiagnosed. is that because there is not really a consistent understanding of what a true food allergy is? that s exactly right. and that what is the study determined. they went through the literature and found each study is using a different criteria. but, the real definition of a food allergy, again, is your immune system, reacting. makin