means. so you got it. there are two e. jean carroll lawsuits. the one that already has been tried which resulted in the verdict mostly for e. jean carroll $5 million, that related to statements donald trump made after he left the presidency, because we don t have these complicated immunity issues. the one that is still pending relates to statements he made while he was president. the question is if doj determines that those statements were made in the course of the official duties of being president, then doj will represent you and they will get the case thrown out on basis of immunity. donald trump s doj under bill barr initially made the controversial decision, yes, donald trump s comments about e. jean carroll were part of his job as president. and then the more surprising part is when merrick garland took in for the biden administration, he agreed. he said yes, that was part of our official job. but now doj has reversed that and said given some of the evidence that came out in th
Horsetalk.co.nz Herbs and nutrients may help calm your horse’s allergies
Picture by Imagesines via Getty Equine Nutrition
Allergies are a common complaint, especially during the warmer months. The typical treatment involves antihistamines or steroids. And these drugs often give good results.
In fact, I would likely do the same for my horses if they were suffering. Allergies are miserable! Coughing, runny eyes and nose, incessant itching – the torment is tough to watch, and you want a solution, fast!
But these drugs do not cure anything. They simply help the symptoms. Why not, instead, try to improve the diet so your horse’s allergies subside – perhaps at first, in addition to the medications you are using. Over time, your horse may respond so favorably, that drugs are no longer needed.
immune from subpoenas meaning they do not have to show up to appear before lawmakers. this is the question that everybody s bouncing around washington right now. that s right. each of these disputes raise can i have the different aspects of that. it doesn t raise immunity issues or executive privilege but that doesn t involve officials. the trump administration is availing itself of a theory that many presidents of both parties have put forward their senior aides are immune from being dra dragged before congress. there s not a lot of precedent that supports it.
know what his record is. you described judge brett cav that s record as essentially making him somewhat of an o outli outlier. he does seem to be somewhat unusual in his views on those presidential immunity and presidential sus peceptibility immunity issues. do you feel like those issues dove tail at all about whether or not this changes the calculus about whether this president should be making a nomination, let alone this nomination at this time, particularly when his own white house is signaling that he may be in the position of potentially being removed from office by his own cabinet. this has been a stunning two days. in the midstdebate,
ultimately, claiming because of these immunity issues. the reality is the president himself made a pledge to get all of our troops out of iraq by the end of his first term. when he fourth quarter of 2011 where he announced the full withdrawal, he said, i am fulfilling the pledge today that i made. it was about fulfilling his pledge. it wasn t about maliki s failure to cut a deal. if you look what he and other senior administration officials said at the time, they re saying the iraqi military is in great shape. it s proven, it s well trained. it s equipped. it can handle the situation. this is a success. now he didn t say my hands were tied. i had no choice. maliki made me do this. he said at the time, this is my choice. it is a sign of our success. he was checking a box and that s what he s done. that was said and he said, i didn t want to leave 10,000 troops there. right. so i mean, look, this was a campaign pledge and he fulfilled it. it s a shame because the