An inference as the only reasonable inference to the exclusion of all others, that it was the deceased who knew it s was, that it was the applicant who knew that it was the deceased in the toilet, fired from the distance as indicated by the state, then of course, the accused may have a case to answer. In considering the state case and strength of the state case im mindful of the decision of s. Versus brankees, page 575, Supreme Court of appeals, handed down by the honor acting justice of appeals shongway page 578 he goes to implicate a application of bail pending appeal whether the sum of circumstantial evidence is sufficient to establish that felons complicity in the planning and preparation of the robbery must be during the appeal for the purpose of the appeal is not necessarily to go beyond simply stating the evidence, likewise i consider the outset of the bail application whereby the very nature of things, the investigation is at a very early stage. This court is left with no optio
Salient features of Income Tax measures
dailytimes.com.pk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dailytimes.com.pk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
PM denies Budget forecasts fantasy
tribune242.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tribune242.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.