you ve mentioned have disappeared, were killed or died which has made things challenginging for the feds. defense attorneys told jurors today, remember, many of the prosecution witnesses are killers, murderers, blcnythieve loan sharks and are only here to save themselves by, quote, telling stories. jurors today also heard about a murder asarroe is accused of killing, the 1969 murder of paul katz who prosecutors say was,qm choked by a dog chain by asarrow and buried in a queens new york basement. what the prosecutors are doing is starting off by laying out stories like this to use them as an scamp of his life of crime. things are interesting. unbelievable details, laura. thanks so much. bill o reilly is going to be here on the real story to weigh in on major immigration vote in congress that addresses sanctuary cities and kate s law. we re also going to ask him about joe biden ponlly getting into the race for the white house. plus, we ll have this, new rail ruhles on drone set to
revolving cast of six or eight democrats. it s never going to be the same that s what the senator was saying. it won t be the same ten democrats. it will be different democrats depending on the bill. one of the first things they will do is this immigration vote on dhs. that is going to really test their ability to get anybody after that back on. wait until they get to trade. which democrats are going to join with the president and who won t on trade? he thinks he can cut a deal on the on trade with republicans. with trade always go to the coast. coastal senators usually are more off to trade than the ones forget about the midwest. we will pause here. back with a three star general who says we have lost the wars in iraq and afghanistan. oh, i love game night. ooh, it s a house and a car! so far, you re horrible at this, flo. yeah, no talent for drawing, flo. house! car! oh, raise the roof! no one? remember when we used to raise the roof, diane? oh, quiet, richard i m t
revolving cast of six or eight democrats. it s never going to be the same that s what the senator was saying. it won t be the same ten democrats. it will be different democrats depending on the bill. one of the first things they will do is this immigration vote on dhs. that is going to really test their ability to get anybody after that back on. wait until they get to trade. which democrats are going to join with the president and who won t on trade? he thinks he can cut a deal on the on trade with republicans. with trade always go to the coast. coastal senators usually are more off to trade than the ones forget about the midwest. we will pause here. back with a three star general who says we have lost the wars in iraq and afghanistan. [ male announcer ] take zzzquil and sleep like. the kids went to nana s house. for the whole weekend! [ snoring ] [ male announcer ] zzzquil, the non habit forming sleep aid that helps you sleep easily and wake refreshed. because
will it be harder for boehner and hk connell to agree. john, i m curious with senate republicans, are they going to have a harder time finding six to eight democrats to get them over 60 vote thresholds or hadder for boehner and mcconnell to agree on specific pieces of legislation? i have been curious about that. i don t think i don t think it s a problem with boehner and mcconnell. i think they get along fine. personally, yes. agree on most things. they will have trouble finding a way to get enough house republicans to agree to things they can get this sort of revolving cast of six or eight democrats. it s never going to be the same that s what the senator was saying. it won t be the same ten democrats. it will be different democrats depending on the bill. one of the first things they will do is this immigration vote on dhs. that is going to really test their ability to get anybody after that back on. wait until they get to trade. which democrats are going to join wit
pursue this this legal case against the president. paul, when you do read the law that was passed and signed by the president, the language actually is pretty clear, that the employer mandate was to go into effect in 2014 and the president did delay it. do you think there is legal standing for this lawsuit? let me say i am a lawyer, although my law school dean at the university of texas said if you want to hide something from begala, put it in a law book, he ll never find it there so i don t want to speculate as a lawyer. let s let the lawyers hash that out. i do think the president s lawyers may win this on the issue of standing and it may not. it may go forward. the politics of this, which is my field. the house will now schedule a vote. requires a vote of the house to sue the president. the democrats are going to kill them on this. they are going to say i m going to say it right now. john boehner will find the time to cast the votes to sue the president, but he won t call up