expressed an interest in traveling to miami. get this, hearing that news, the governor of the state of florida ron desantis had a message. do not come to florida. life will not be easy for you. instead, there is funds place to bust illegal migrants out of his state and into places like delaware where the president is from. even martha s vineyard. you point out, shannon, not just republicans showing concerns for illegal migration and the impact lifting title 42 could really have on that. arizona democratic senator calling on the administration to delay lifting title 42 and in case you don t remember, this is for the folks at home, the immigration policy put in place on the onset of the pandemic that allowed for the expulsions of migrants who cross to do to the virus. she is one of several democrats are urging the administration to simply stand down for the time being. it is still possible and they may do that, we will have to see it together.
all that by sending out 4,000 national guardsmen that it s an utter waste of money, it s not like they can go out and arrest, they can just protect. they should be used elsewhere. what else is there to do? there s no immigration policy put in place at this point. a wall or spending for such was not in the latest spending bill. it seems that this is the only solution at this juncture. well, there s no question that at least in terms of this being a really outrageous new change, that s relatively political and over-blown. the number is up to 4,000 deployed. president bush sent 6,000 a decade ago. and it s for some of the same, similar sorts of things. i do think at least the other side of the political coin is there are political benefits to president trump doing this. he s had some difficulty with getting his immigration agenda passed in congress and this allows him to say to people who care about border security,
some democrats argue first of all that by sending out 4,000 national guardsmen that it s an utter waste of money, it s not like they can go out and arrest, they can just protect. they should be used elsewhere. what else is there to do? there s no immigration policy put in place at this point. a wall or spending for such was not in the latest spending bill. it seems that this is the only solution at this juncture. well, there s no question that at least in terms of this being a really outrageous new change, that s relatively political and over-blown. the number is up to 4,000 deployed. president bush sent 6,000 a decade ago. and it s for some of the same, similar sorts of things. i do think at least the other side of the political coin is there are political benefits to president trump doing this. he s had some difficulty with getting his immigration agenda passed in congress and this allows him to say to people who care about border security,
it done. to kick it down the road for another month, we re not going to know anything then that we don t know now. so i m just through taking these half steps. this is a terrible way to try to govern. senator rounds? i agree with angus. that s the reason why i m opposing it as well. we both want to see an immigration policy put together. the proposal lindsey has been working hard on may not be perfect but a step in the right direction. it s a vehicle we can use long term to fix a lot of stuff that s in the immigration world today. but for me it s a matter of defense and a matter of trying to make sure that in the future the message is let s get our work done on time. it has been 44 years since we actually had a budget act that was workable. in the last 44 years in three cases have we gotten this done
that those seeking admission into our country must be able to support themselves financially and should not use welfare for a period of at least five years. ed: president trump claiming is he trying to revamp immigration policy put in place by the clinton administration. some are still trying to say this is trump trying to slam immigrants. steve: dan bongino joins us from palm beach gardens. dan, good morning to you. ainsley: good morning. hey, good to be here. good morning, guys. steve: when the president of the united states says five years with illegals. that s the law of the land ever since bill clinton? yeah, it is the law of the land. to all the liberals out there freaking out, i just want to send a strong message to you. this is a compassionate policy. the american dream is hard work, learning the language. i think back to a story i have told on this show before about my mother-in-law who came here