think? this san issue you ve been covering a lot on your show and in your reporting. i think what the interesting thing here is that this is very limited to educational compensation but the broader implication if you read some of the decisions and some of the arguments made in this entire process it seems really clear that the supreme court is not buying this amateurism argument, the ncaa put forth for decades frankly. the implications on future cases whether athletes will be able to be compensated for their names and images and likenesses this doesn t have direct implications there but seems like the argument has been eroing we might be paving the way for athletes to be compensated. we spoke with last week or the week before actually an athlete working on sort of a state track here in this what s called nil the name image likeness track to allow athletes