huge story. no. and here s why. the supreme court essentially said to donald trump and the trump administration it doesn t have the,tive privilege over itr its communications when it comes to january 6th. all that does is move forward with the ability to see what is inside of those communication communications. but the press treats that decision as though it s an indictment, as though it s a conclusion. see, and this is the press technique when they argue from conclusion which they did over four years. specifically, for example, best illustrated, how d, in the russia collusion case. every single report, every single rumor was reported breathlessly as though it was a conclusion until four years passed9, and it all a amounts to nothing. it s all a joke. now, i m not saying i don t know, i don t know where january 6th investigation will lead. i do think it s highly partisan. but what happens is you take every little step along the way, in this case the supreme court ruling that essenti
military occupation. breaking news from washington, alex, good morning. ashley, carly, good morning and french president emmanuel macron and president biden and vladimir putin with the idea of a meeting. president biden participation sing the policies will be pursued until the moment invasion begins. and i told that the tanks were actually moving in the plains actually flying and the palms actually dropping. we are going to do everything we can with the persuasion to get president prudent to reverse the decision that we believe he has made. according to two senior officials the russian commander skipping to proceed with invasion on ukraine. illustrated by satellite images showing russian armored equipment moving in to attack positions. in a letter published by the washington post, u.s. ambassador wrote to the u.n.