country has invaded, downgrading the security of their neighborhoods. there are other ways to guarantee that security whether it s a u.n. force, there are other ways to guarantee the safety of their security. i think one important thing to note here is that you can t equate people who speak russian with people who sympathize with russia. there are a lot of russian speakers in crimea but there are also a lot of russian speakers in kiev and brighton beach. that doesn t mean during a political turmoil you get the ability to invade. ultimately i think there s a way to address the concerns, illegitimate as they are, that some of his folks are in danger with a multi lateral effort. and also the precedent that s being here asserted by the putin government, which is basically the prerogative to invade a country if they feel that ethnic russians are under threat is a terrifying one, i would imagine, for many of russia s neighbors who obviously have large populations of russian speakers.
other ways to guarantee the safety of their security. i think one important thing to note here is that you can t equate people who speak russian with people who sympathize with russia. there are a lot of russian speakers in crimea but there are also a lot of russian speakers in kiev and brighton beach. that doesn t mean during a political turmoil you get the ability to invade. ultimately i think there s a way to address the concerns, illegitimate as they are, that some of his folks are in danger with a multi lateral effort. and also the precedent that s being here asserted by the putin government and sergey lavrov, which is basically the prerogative to invade a country if they feel that ethnic russians are under threat is a terrifying one for many of russia s neighbors who obviously have large populations of russian speakers. and again, that s why i think
country has invaded, downgrading the security of their neighborhoods. there are other ways to guarantee that security whether it s a u.n. force, there are other ways to guarantee the safety of their security. i think one important thing to note here is that you can t equate people who speak russian with people who sympathize with russia. there are a lot of russian speakers in crimea but there are also a lot of russian speakers in kiev and brighton beach. that doesn t mean during a political turmoil you get the ability to invade. ultimately i think there s a way to address the concerns, illegitimate as they are, that some of his folks are in danger with a multi lateral effort. and also the precedent that s being here asserted by the putin government, which is basically the prerogative to invade a country if they feel that ethnic russians are under threat is a terrifying one, i would imagine, for many of russia s neighbors who obviously have large populations of russian speakers. and
under the fig leaf, of protecting civilians, support the rebel push west towards sirte and tripoli. you continue doing what it takes to do what the president said had the coalition didn t say nato, there is wiggle room within that u.n. resolution to arm the rebels and provide enough oomph for them to go after qaddafi and the key behind this is the is a multinational lateral effort and he s been criticized for that, the president, but the explosion in syria and bahrain says it should be multi-lateral but that doesn t mean you need to be weak and defensive and give a signal you are not interested in victory and when you read the president s saturday address, it is apologetic and defensive and i m afraid that s what we ll