the actual cost to us all as republicans defend the president? the president is not a racist. then what do you do when the leader of the free world is a racist? congressman al green on his push to impeach the president in the wake of his racist attacks. you file articles of impeachment. plus, what exactly is the deal with lindsey graham? i can t go where donald trump takes the party and i think the country. and why new numbers out today suggest the massive democratic field could shrink to single digits soon, when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. just an hour ago, the house voted to condemn president trump s racist tweets, telling four democratic congresswomen of color to, quote, go back where they came from. i rise with a sense of righteous indignation to support this resolution.
republicans defend the president? the president is not a racist. then what do you do when the leader of the free world is a racist? congressman al green on his push to impeach the president in the wake of his racist attacks. you file articles of impeachment. plus, what exactly is the deal with lindsey graham? i can t go where donald trump takes the party and i think the country. and why new numbers out today suggest the massive democratic field could shrink to single digits soon, when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. just an hour ago, the house voted to condemn president trump s racist tweets, telling four democratic congresswomen of color to, quote, go back where they came from. i rise with a sense of righteous indignation to support this resolution.
don t need to wait to be asked. they can go and knock on the fbi s door. they can go to the nearest field office. they can call that field office. they can make their voices known. but it will be a combination of things. there will be a follow-up on obviously dr. ford s testimony to include a discussion with her. she will she provides names of other individuals that can be talked to, they will talk to them as well. you raise a great question or point on the idea of scope. i think that first of all, the genie is out of the bottle. scope in investigations in general are wild animals. the only way to control scope or an investigation is not to ask any questions. and so once the information starts flowing, you don t stop and you don t say well, i can t go and check that or i can t go and check this. you go out and take care of business. you ask questions. you interview people. you put together your reports. i think the one thing that is a bit of an inhibitor in all of this is the fact
them? it could be a combination of those things. in fact, one of the things that i would absolutely state up front is if there are any folks out there that have anything to provide to this information author investigation that. don t need to wait to be asked. they can go and knock on the fbi s door. they can go to the nearest field office. they can call that field office. they can make their voices known. but it will be a combination of things. there will be a follow-up on obviously dr. ford s testimony to include a discussion with her. she will she provides names of other individuals that can be talked to, they will talk to them as well. you raise a great question or point on the idea of scope. i think that first of all, the genie is out of the bottle. scope in investigations in general are wild animals. the only way to control scope or an investigation is not to ask any questions. and so once the information starts flowing, you don t stop and you don t say well, i can t go and
out rages of the entire circumstance, you had the wife of bruce ohr, senior justice official, never got to the court to authorize. i know what you re talking about. you said it s not a secret court. it s not a secret court. if you and i can t go and watch, that s that s not the definition. remember how it was before. don t let perfection be the enemy of progress. it used to be we didn t know what the hell it was based on. they put in this law, congress did as a function of oversight to make sure there were levels and standards to be followed. here you had multiple judges all part of this conspiracy of crazy if you believe your opinion on it. no, that s totally different. i m not saying the judges are part of some crazy conspiracy, i m saying they were not told the truth. the woods procedures would have required. what s in there? let s see, chris, you and i will not know what s in there and not in there. going off the same report you are. president on the side of