i mean, why doesn t lindsey graham stand up now, why distant paul ryan stand up now and say as a result of what happened, the tragic loss of life in benghazi, we are going to support a bill to increase security for our international staff? because that would be the ethical thing to do. and these folk are just purely engaged in politics. i m sorry to say. and i think david is right here, as well. that lindsey graham has painted himself a little bit into a trap. he s going to be outflanked by multiple candidates in his primary. and so he needs benghazi now, really, just for his campaign. just to say i m on the right or i m on the right to myself. and at the end of the day, you know, you re right. we know that this congress did not fully fund the package for embassies or for security and so the irony of that of the benghazi tragedy is that we didn t get it right in the first place and we re not getting it right now because we re playing politics. right. igor, do you think 60 minute
this mistake was made in the first place, why after a year of reporting it came down to this. my en, was it an ideological kind of push on in terms of what the network was doing? was there maybe some kind of connection with the publisher of the book that is owned by the same company of 60 minutes? there s a lot of questions here and they have to be forthright in answering them. and this is what the second, third time that cbs has found itself in this kind of position. we all remember memo gate and dan rather and what happened there. so why is this happening again? igor volski, ask david corn, thank you so much. up next, doughnuts. finally something rand paul could not have lifted from wikipedia. stay with us. [ woman 1 ] why do i cook? to share with family. [ woman 2 ] to carry on traditions.