campaign, if they were given op research, isn t that what the dnc did with the ukraine? remember, let s put this into the perspective of what was going on. they were in the middle of a campaign. the heat of the campaign here. what happens? someone comes forward with opposition research.m why did thee dnc have their operatives meeting with the ukrainians and actually getting information? why is that not one standard and this is another? what law was violated here? some of the theories that some of the commentators have put forward are ridiculous. there was no illegality in that meeting. on top of that, there was no information that was obtained. there you have it. sean: we will take a quick break. more with jay sekulow and his reaction to our interview with donald trump jr. you don t want to miss this latermo tonight. there the democrats go again. trump colluded with russia. the russians hacked the agelection. no, y all just lost the election fair and square.
generally reaction. myon friend, mike huckabee, said something very similar. the media is going after donald trump jr. for doing what? releasing the full email chain, unlike secretary clinton who deleted her emails. let s put that in perspective. look at it from a legal perspective. t there s no illegality in the meeting. the fact is, nothing transpired. what we have here? i think donald trump jr. said it correctly. through the media frenzy on russia. this has been going on for several months. when you look and see what actually took place, a meeting took place. nothing happened from this 15-20 minute meeting. and at the end of the day, there s no illegality. they want to create a media hysteria. i m trying to look at the lawyer and say what statute of law has been violated?
look, at the end of the day, when you look at all of the evidence, there is one thing that becomes clear. no illegality in that meeting. the media can talk about it but show me the criminal statute that is actually met with that kind of situation. sean: jonathan turley, he agrees with you. he went on to say he s a george washington lawyer. he says everyone needs to calm down. i agree with him. sean: we wrap up the show with a smile. he gets the final word all of thisis week. take a little look at what you re getting next. here the democrats go again. trump colluded with russia. the russians hacked the election. no, y all just lost the election fair and square. [laughs] sean: conservative social media twitter sensation terrence williams gives us a brand-new video. he gets the last word tonight and all week. that is next. it was our detergent.
it was never my intention to tihave that. in a previous statement, donald trump jr. said the same thing. she never producedru solid information about hillary clinton. he says that she didn t even really make sense when talking about clinton. it s worth noting that the legal team pointed out they think the whole meeting could have been a set up. it was made to look like potential russian collusion. the team also said that the russian lawyer is connected to fusion gps, the opposition research firm that produced the discredited christopher steele dossier on donald trump. by the way, as the new york post has reported, fusion gps has several ties to the democrats, including clinton allies and even planned parenthood. from looking at the facts as we have them, a friend of the trumps offered to coordinate a meeting t to share opposition research on hillary clinton, which donald trump jr. agreed to. nothing came of it because there was no information exchange. then it ended there. the democ
it sea just a tough game. sean: i guess you have a stafff of people that work for you did anyone research the lawyer or anybody involved in this? a donald jr.,: we didn t know who it was before the meeting. we didn t know who it was before the meeting. wor apparently, she is a prosecutor in moscow. 14 years ago, she was a prosecutor. it was such a nothing. i literally would not have remembered the meeting. sean: were you annoyed, based on. donald jr.,: sometimes you do things for acquaintances and friends. sean: i hate hypothetical questions but i think it s success third hypothetical question relevant in this case ifth te meeting resulted in information that you felt, in any way, was illegal or compromising or collusion, to use the media s term donald jr.,: i would bring