adam schiff made up our conversation with the president of ukraine. if he didn t do that in the halls of congress, he would be thrown into jail! but he did it in the halls of congress, and he s given immunity. this is a person, he s a liar. laura: the ingraham angle s impeachment article three: invasion of privacy. now, without a warrant, adam schiff obtained the phone records of americans, including the president s personal attorney and congressman devin nunes. they published the phone records of the president s personal lawyer, the phone records of a member of the press, and thes phone records of the chairman intelligent committee congressman nunes. to impeach the president 11 months before an election. be careful, you are under oath. i know i am under oath, sir.
laura: alan, you said those two weak articles of impeachment, don t even rise to the constitutional requirement here, explain that to our viewers tonight. they are just simply being made up. there is nothing in the constitution about abuse of power, obstruct the constitution provides the full criteria, treason, bribery, other high high crimes and misdemeanors. it is an abuse by congress to impeach a president on grounds not in the constitution. congress is not above the law. they can t just make it up. the two they selected, abuse of power and obstruction of congress, can be used against any president if the other side controls the house. it could also, as you ve suggested, be used against house members. they are so vague and open-ended, exactly what james madison rejected at the constitutional convention, and what alexander hamilton said was the greatest danger, the greatest danger is that impeachment will turn on who has
why doesn t somebody demand that schiff answer questions under oath? and why isn t a sham impeachment an open and shut case of democrats dereliction of duty? in other words, to the country? if it were only that simple. article two, section four of the united states constitution stipulates that the president, vice president, and all civil officers of the united states can be impeached and removed from office on three charges. bribery, treason, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. now, the house has only impeached one member of congress, all right? it was back in 1799. a little history lesson. senator william blount had allegedly conspired to incite native americans and frontiersmen to attack the spanish lands of florida and louisiana. now, the senate ultimately dismissed the case, arguing that members of congress do not constitute, under the constitution, civil officers.
laura: okay, now, if trump can obstruct congress without any type of court proceedings, then the chairman of the intel committee can also obstruct congress. if they are going to play this game, then let s play it. he can obstruct congress by refusing to give republicans their rights to call witnesses, including the whistle-blower. adam schiff, yes, guilty as charged.es meanwhile, back in the real world, you see why i m doing this? the target of all of this president trump is on a roll, and he even seems to be basking in the glow of it all tonight in pennsylvania. president trump: they are embarrassed by the impeachment, and our poll numbers have gone through the roof because of her stupid impeachment. while we are delivering historic victories for the american people, the radical left democrats and of the failed washington establishment are trying to erase your votes,
result of the fisa warrant, they went through everything. laura: donald trump is really fortunate to have that man as our attorney general, i can tell you that right now. absolutely right. article four of our impeachmentr charges against this democrat congress, obstruction of congress. now, what about schiff refusing to testify before the house judiciary committee hearing? and his refusal to allow republicans to call the whistle-blower and others? you are refusing to answer whether you communicated with the whistle-blower? the whistle-blower is not relevant to this report he is the basis of the sbeginning of this investigatio. your staff is the only staff of any member of congress who has had a chance to talk to that individual. i do not know the identity of the whistle-blower and i m determined to make sure that identity is protected. what agency was this individual from? i could interject here.nc we don t want to use these proceedings it s our time i know, b