departments that discriminate black which we cover too. exactly. but that doesn t mean that what happened in this case we should suspend judgment. and it is hard to do what you did, megyn early on and to say wait for the facts and don t rush to judgment when you have a media mob stampedeing in one direction. and because you get accused of being an apologyist for the police or flat out accused of what happened. that s what happened. to me you get used to it because they said i was racially insensitive when i urged caution in the duke coverage and trayvon martin coverage and this coverage now. but you can t look at it as a cheerleader. that s what happened in the mainstream media. if you question the narrative in some of these stories you must be a racist, you must be an islamophobe. we ll get to that with ie yan hirsi next.
insensitive when i urged caution in the duke coverage and trayvon martin coverage and this coverage now. but you can t look at it as a cheerleader. that s what happened in the mainstream media. if you question the narrative in some of these stories you must be a racist, you must be an islamophobe. we ll get to that with ie yan hirsi next. if i felt creating almost a lynch mob mentality because it s been a narrative they wanted to push. in fairness of some reporters covering this, they had michael brown friends saying shot in the back which we know was a lie. the ferguson police department in the opening days and weeks didn t say no i totally disagree with you because law enforcement typically doesn t talk. when i was covering the supreme court for the department of justice it was almost impossible because doj never