implements the will of the people. he does not work for the u.n. he works for americans. that s what he did. neil: what if another government come up with equally deep pockets, let s say china or russia and says we ll cover the difference? that s the concern. that there is the concern. that s why i m a little reluctant to say we need to do it or we should just eliminate all funds. we need to take everything on a case by case basis and still furthering the u.s. interest. it s a tool. i don t think we need to make an idealogical stand against the u.n. here. we need to be careful. certainly shouldn t be a given that the u.n. is the ashevil asheville arbiter of all things right. neil: well put. you have a merry christmas. you too. neil: and do you remember drill, baby drill? we are, after this.
anybody. it seems as though some of them were sensible about any story that might appear as though it criticizes the government. a couple news story about your resignation cited. is that an example of someone you felt had this idealogical stand and was uncomfortable with stories about the administration that were unflattering. pat scheffler was the executive producer of the evening news, and i think there s no secret that there were a number of people at cbs news that had serious issues, but serious issues. what do you mean? there were discussions about certain types of stories that got on the air, there were discussions about the heavy-handed editing. in other words, we had not experienced at least i had not experienced and some of them said they had not experienced the extent to which some of the editing went on. that may not be just her. there are certainly a group of managers in what they call the fishbowl of new york who are responsible, so it s hard to say it s all at