theatrical ploy to renegotiate the price. he left the door open for that possibility. in making the twitter offer was reliant upon the truth and accuracy of the public filing said those filings are not accurate it simply not the best you can t pay the same price. if so at a different price it might be totally viable deal. it s not out of the question. and with twitter shares training roughly 30 percent below the deal price and 5 percent below the investor certainly agree or disagree wit twitter s outlook on the curren deal. i want to highlight must mow a due diligence to close it faster . he accepted what they said abou either data and a source inside twitter tells me they re evaluating legal recourse in case they back out. shows just how much leverage must have and he knows that. whether buyer would go near it at this point.
just hit pause on a deal. it s the ultimate friday the 13th story and it s elon musk super twitter troll at it again and stock is down nearly 10% on the day. twitter stock suffering as a result. investors even less confident he s going to go through with this. here is what dan ives said in a note to clients, he said the street will view this one of three ways. one, it s likely falling apart or musk is negotiating for a lower deal price or musk is simply going to walk away from the deal and view this as a $1 billion fee. ease using this as a way to get out of the deal in a vastly changing market. tesla stock has been dragged down, all of a sudden musk is not worth as much as he was. he was relying on tesla shares in order to finance part of this deal so this might be a convoluted way to back out of the deal, but with elon musk you never know for sure. so if he backs out for good, what happens? i think this would go back to
The fair value and fair market value appraisal standards applicable in contested buyout and dissenting shareholder valuations cut across state lines, which is one of the main reasons I.
A recent Court of Chancery decision adds yet another wrinkle to the appraisal landscape and the potential for appraisal arbitrage. In BCIM Strategic Value Master Fund LP v. HFF, Inc. (Del. Ch. Feb. 2, 2022).
A recent Court of Chancery decision adds yet another wrinkle to the appraisal landscape and the potential for appraisal arbitrage. In BCIM Strategic Value Master Fund LP v. HFF, Inc..