first of all, you didn t have to do that as the commissioner, you chose to do that. i chose to do that, that s true. it shows that there is no rule of law in this fantasy candidate draft. no, there is not. nope. a monarchy of one. yes. but i think that i sort of have a theory of this, donald trump has pretended to run for president so many times, he even flirted with the idea back in 1988 and no one believed it anymore. and the only way donald trump could get people to believe that he was going to run for president was to actually run for president. and i think it s possible this whole thing started off as a publicity stunt. obviously, it s not that anymore. and i also think donald trump because of always have been happy to take the presidency were it handed to him. but it s really gone beyond the expectations of almost everybody, and i have to wonder if it s gone way beyond the expectations of donald trump himself. i tend to think that might be the case. and robert drape
raise it to the horizon. this isn t my gaze, but your party. we ve been too timid on policy. we ve been too timid on vision. we have none. this is what i think we can unify over which is so people understand why we make decisions on a day-to-day basis, they don t understand where we re going. we have to show people where we re going and what horizon we re shooting for. what are our ideas and apply them to the problems of the day to get solutions for working families so they can get ahead and they can see that we can get this american idea back. that s the problem. we fight over tactics, because we don t have a vision. we have to have a vision and offer an alternative to this country so they can see if we get the chance to lead, if we get the presidency and keep congress, this is what it would look like, this is how we ll fix the problems working families are facing. that is what we have not done. that s what we need to do.
russia, china, great britain, france, they caved to us? i think if we go in there and let congress vote up or down. what white house and harry reid say they ll filibuster the deal and forbid a up and down vote. it becomes political in america. if you let an up or down vote happen in congress and at least the american people have spoken on the world stage. it only makes those numbers even worse. do we have foreign policy now by poll or let s vote on it? if you want to look at polls, majority oppose it. the white house doesn t want to do that. that s what i mean. a majority of people polled oppose it, we should say, okay, we re out of it? why have a congress, mike? people vote for their representatives. we have a guy in the white house who had this idea back in 2007 that he was going to deal with iran unilaterally if he were ever elected president no
live at 7:30 eastern time. i wonder, kelly, who does that? who does that? that s just you get that personal. apparently the governor missed that whole chapter between rush limbaugh and sandra fluke, the woman who testified on capitol hill and he went so personal in his comments about her and that backfired. she became more empowered. certainly the governor s position about abortion rights is well known. so a lot of the other things he said didn t surprise anyone. but to go that personal against a woman who had obviously touched a nerve, had a lot of support and simply used the democratic process. nobody likes a filibuster when it s not their issue. i like how it s hated given the day and moment and party. she used the rules and got a lot of attention for an issue she believed in. those who want to bring this idea back, will do it again as early as next week. the underlying bill they re talking about would be to limit abortion at 20 weeks and to
almost universally supported. they voted it through in the house. they paid for it to some extent withes their constituents in the mid terms. but i think that bringing that idea back is such a nonstarter that i can t imagine a compromise position between the white house, which is saying they want to protect medicare recipients, and vouchers. i don t think that will fly with democrats at all. what s striking to me is that these issues are still so hard and that the election didn t seem to solve them completely enough. well, that s a statement rather than a question. so i ll just talk about something that i want to talk about, which is well, but i mean, is that true? why didn t it? why didn t it? because look, the republicans cannot give on taxes. they simply can t. it would damage their brand permanently. and the president is unwilling to he is insisting on raising revenues through taxes. there s no way to have a meeting of the minds when those differences exist. and that