are stupider than he is and that is what he complained about only having 10 challenges to use against potential jurors in the selection process. the trump defense and the prosecution each have already used six of the 10 challenges with seven jurors seated in the case with a additional five necessary to complete 212 person jury with six alternates yet to be chosen. today at social media trump said i thought strikes were supposed to be unlimited when we were picking our jury. i was then told we only had 10. not nearly enough. trump s lawyers have known or should have known from the day trump got indicted a year ago that for the crimes he is charged with, every defendant in the state of new york and every prosecutor gets 10 challenges. if trump went out on fifth avenue and shot someone then he
agree to the unanimous consent request by senator schumer were upon senator schumer said okay let s just go to to dismiss the case now which is essentially what they did after going through a few procedural votes on the senate floor but thrown up there desperately and hopelessly by other republicans like eric schmidt. the whole thing took a few hours and that was the end of it. senator schumer was offering the republicans of ours of debate in that was cut off by the idiocy of republican senator eric schmidt am a freshman who had no idea what he was doing on the senate floor today. so the senate voted along party lines the motion to dismiss and closed the book on the single most absurd impeachment case ever sent to the u.s. senate. the impeachment of homeland security secretary alejandro. that is all over. meanwhile in the house of are
for whatever period of time we are talking about, that is several shifts of agents, that would require a hearing where the secret service is testifying about protecting him there and they will testify they do not know how to do that. i know the judge is envisioning, unlike any other defendant, putting this person in jail has logistical and practical challenges that may be beyond their capacities. then can open a question like, do you give him home confinement as a alternative? in that case make the secret service be his jailers as well as protectors? i hate to sound a hardened former prosecutor but that plea falls on deaf ears to me. there are places in jails that somebody can be kept very safe. put him in a cell with nobody
the court held that he is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process and cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer. the da would also use the criminal conviction of the trump business, people versus the trump corporation. quote trump corporation and payroll court, convicted of 17 felony counts of scheming to defraud conspiracy, and falsifying business records in connection with a scheme to pay unreported non-cash compensation to top executives and the da would use another civil case against trump, defendant illegally allowed his 2016 presidential campaign to orchestrate a fundraiser for the donald trump foundation, direct distribution of the funds and
this is another case of that by jesse waters lying about the seven jurors already seated in the case. trump adopted the lie on his own and put it on social media and violated the judges order in the case for all parties to never say anything about jurors and violated the specific gag order on trump and andrew, what are you expecting now? tomorrow morning when the judge gavels this case back into the process of jury selection. do you expect to hear about this is the first item of business? yes. let me point out, the fact of the statements being lies or truthful is irrelevant to the issue. to be clear that gag order was not making any public statements. even if they were truthful it would be a violation.