cooperative. you don t want to see it escalate. and certainly we don t want to see any sort of escalating of violating confrontations. and so but it is heart breaking to see the kind of anxiety that this is creating across the nation. so you don t have the list that i.c.e. agents have, but i wanted to ask you about this report from the new york times specifically talking about collateral deportations in which those who are not necessarily on the list, if in fact, they are in the vicinity can be apprehended as well. what is your reaction to that and how concerned are you if, in fact, that does take place? i m very concerned. you know, i think many people agree that if someone is here illegally and commits a serious crime, that s certainly what the federal government should be focusing on, should be targeting. i don t think there s much disagreement on that. but i think we all agree in this country and particularly in a city like miami that s a very international city, a city of
act. waiver only lasts for ten days. look at a remote village. report a major withdraw of sta embassy in havana. according to several reports, only essential personnel will remain. this comes after cuban foreign minister met with rex tillerson vowing his country is not behind the attack. arrested nearly 500 people after a nationwide operation. reflects the trump administrations push to crack down on the illegal immigration. ice agents have made 43% more arrest since trump took office. at the same time, deportation statistics are low compared to last year. uproar over revelations tom price s expensive travel on the
for example, the i.c.e. agents have told us if they could work with the local community, the local law enforcement agents, they would be much more effective in securing our interior. the democrats do not want any local enforcement of immigration laws. we do it with drug laws. we do it with all ease other things where we have these task forces between the federal and state and local agencies, and the democrats do not want to deal with immigration. we could do that and we could curtail a lot of the illegal immigration. there s a lot of other things we can ekd do to make the law stronger. david, respond to that. the cbo said it would reduce it by a third to 50%, and the congressman won t support it unlessitis 100% because we d have to do a reagan. that s not what i said. don t put words in my mouth. the current law produces x much illegal immigration. this law cuts it significantly. it s better than the current law. generally when something is
for example, the i.c.e. agents have told us if they could work with the local community, the local law enforcement agents, they would be much more effective in securing our interior. the democrats do not want any local enforcement of immigration laws. we do it with drug laws. we do it with all ease other things where we have these task forces between the federal and state and local agencies, and the democrats do not want to deal with immigration. we could do that and we could curtail a lot of the illegal immigration. there s a lot of other things we can ekd do to make the law stronger. david, respond to that. the cbo said it would reduce it by a third to 50%, and the congressman won t support it unlessitis 100% because we d have to do a reagan. that s not what i said. don t put words in my mouth. the current law produces x much illegal immigration. this law cuts it significantly. it s better than the current
law that we need to change. for example, the i.c.e. agents have told us if they could work with the local community, the local law enforcement agents, they would be much more effective in securing our interior. the democrats do not want any local enforcement of immigration laws. we do it with drug laws. we do it with all these other things where we have these task forces between the federal and state and local agencies, and the democrats do not want to deal with immigration. we could do that and we could curtail a lot of the illegal immigration. there s a lot of other things we can do to make the law stronger. david, respond to that. the cbo said it would reduce it by a third to 50%, and the congressman won t support it unless it s 100% because we d have to do a reagan. that s not what i said. don t put words in my mouth. the current law produces x much illegal immigration. this law cuts it significantly. it s better than the current