at the time. but we hear that the decisions he made, there is nothing he can say to you that can improve things. what would you like him to say? things. what would you like him to sa ? , ., , things. what would you like him to sa ? , . , ., things. what would you like him to sa? say? anything he has to say could have been said say? anything he has to say could have been said a say? anything he has to say could have been said a long say? anything he has to say could have been said a long time - say? anything he has to say could have been said a long time ago i say? anything he has to say could l have been said a long time ago that we are nearly four years since the beginning of the pandemic. it is continuing, people are continuing to die every week. i don t think he has got anything helpful to say at this point other than to tell the truth about why decisions were made and why failures happen in the kale that was at the heart of his government. do you think he can be
had it been, i am that being brought to my attention. had it been, lam highly that being brought to my attention. had it been, i am highly confident that i would have said that we should put in place such a provision because the impact on the overall virus would have been relatively low because, although the numbers are far too big, they are as part of the population relatively low. and in the same way that we realise that our initial regulations, in terms of how they impacted funerals, for example, were much firmer in their interpretation on the ground than we had intended so we therefore changed them, that is the sort of thing that i certainly would have been open to considering and i am pretty sure i would have been in favour of it had it been brought to my attention, but i haven t seen any paperwork on this question. i haven t seen any paperwork on this cuestion. , ., , , , question. open to considering it is helful, question. open to considering it is helpful. thank qu
lockdown was on the 25th. i discussed on the 25th. so the i lockdown was on the 25th. one discussed on the 25th. so the - lockdown was on the 25th. one final question. lockdown was on the 25th. one final question. please, lockdown was on the 25th. one final question, please, in lockdown was on the 25th. one final question, please, in relation- lockdown was on the 25th. one final question, please, in relation to - lockdown was on the 25th. one final question, please, in relation to the i question, please, in relation to the tockdown question, please, in relation to the lockdown decision, question, please, in relation to the lockdown decision, mr question, please, in relation to the lockdown decision, mr hancock. i question, please, in relation to the i lockdown decision, mr hancock. could we just lockdown decision, mr hancock. could we just have lockdown decision, mr hancock. could we just have up lockdown decision, mr hancock. could we just have up to lockdown
unforgivable to be honest, all the way through- unforgivable to be honest, all the wa throu~h. ~ . . . way through. we have dealt with that in evidence already way through. we have dealt with that in evidence already but way through. we have dealt with that in evidence already but thank - way through. we have dealt with that in evidence already but thank you. i l in evidence already but thank you. i will move on as the final section and firmly with lessons learned, how to do things better going forward. there may be a couple of topics you might want to raise, but one you have touched on already, i promised i would return back to it, that would be your view as to the placement of the metro mayors in the civil resilience structure. i said i would come back to that. is that something you wanted to deal with? yes, i think it is what should be there yes, i think it is what should be there in yes, i think it is what should be there in a yes, i think it is what should be t