2010, i agree with nick debates, that change the dynamic of that election. it is a format that will be better for rishi election. it is a format that will be betterfor rishi sunak in particular. when you look at p.m. queues, it is a bit of argy bargy and the nature of the short short answers means it can look a punch and judy but in a proper debate, there is no mps and judy but in a proper debate, there is no mp5 on the sidelines making jokes. we will see a side of the prime minister that we haven t seen. ~ , ~ . the prime minister that we haven t seen. ~ , . ., ., , seen. will they change anything, wes? we will seen. will they change anything, wes? we will find seen. will they change anything, wes? we will find out. seen. will they change anything, wes? we will find out. the - wes? we will find out. the usefulness wes? we will find out. the usefulness of wes? we will find out. the usefulness of the - wes? we will find out. the usefulness of the debates l wes? we will find ou
difficulty now is to find a solution. yes. i think the difficulty now is firstly, to find a solution. yes. i think the difficulty now is firstly, it - to find a solution. yes. i think the difficulty now is firstly, it has - difficulty now is firstly, it has become difficulty now is firstly, it has become increasingly - difficulty now is firstly, it has. become increasingly clear that there is only become increasingly clear that there is only one become increasingly clear that there is only one nran become increasingly clear that there is only one man that become increasingly clear that there is only one man that takes - become increasingly clear that there is only one man that takes decisionl is only one man that takes decision and that is only one man that takes decision and that one man is only one man that takes decision and that one man doesn t - is only one man that takes decision and that one man doesn t exactly. and that one man doesn t exactly listen and that o