what are you waiting to hear at this debate that might help you decide. as many times as i heard michele bachmann speak, i never felt likevy seen the real her. it s always a political face. i about cried when i started to seeing in the debate performance. i d like to see someone with more executive experience. he could easily go across the aisle. you don t trust him i don t trust him. debate gaffes, they matter. rick, i tell you what. $10,000. the wager offer for mitt romney in saturday debate was noticed. i bet you $5 bucks. the fact he said $10,000 stood out to me. i thought this guy who commonly bets $10,000 to his friends about things? something i couldn t relate to. candidate in the final
could say what mechanism will be used. so at this point the bill is still stuck. bret: ed henry on the north lawn. ed, thank you. in the months we have been telling yu about the government failed gun tracking program. called operation fast and furious. many of you were no doubt asking yourselves what were they thinking? tonight, correspondent william la jeunesse tells us about one theory. when you screw up, say you screw up. people who are involved say they screw up and don t allow your screw up to be the basis for trying to extend the legislative ada. recurring allegation hurled at the attorney general. the justice department came up with a flawed program in order to justify a regulation. but that is what the gun owners feared that operation fast and furious was used to justify a new law that congress was unlikely to pass. demanding gun stores report anyone buying multiple rifles or long gun over a one-week period.
the remarks are part of a romney ad. i don t think right wing social engineering is more desirable than social enginee engineering. he accused him of supporting the original plan. he praised ryan and supported keeping traditional medicare as an option that gingrich does as well. he wanted to be a voluntary choice. medicare has $36 trillion in unfunded promises. other republicans and democratic plan limit the medicare spending. you don t slow the growth
yourself if you step in it. bret: this is the second time you work the questions over with us in the panel of it s pretty amazing process going through the questions and how we come up to them. it is. not to pat ourselves on the back too much but i have watched the other debate and seen repetitive questions from what we have seen. we have already heard the answer to that 20 times. i will say this team works hard not to just keep repeating the same questions and getting back the same answers. you know, we sit in debate meetings and we say we heard the answer to that. we try to incorporate answers we have already heard in question to move the story forward and advance the ball. it s up to the candidate to answer questions asked, because this is our debate. bret: do you think it s the biggest challenge tonight? keeping it moval and keeping it. don t you find it frustrating when they don t answer the question asked? you are not supposed to disrupt them. i ll do what my nana doe
challenges america faces that is a dramatic reading from the most famous real press release of the 2012 campaign, performed by john lithgow. on may 19, the author of that press release was long time gingrich spokesman rick tyler who was responding to the tidal wave gingrich was getting after the seemingly disastrous enter swu with david gregory on meet the press where gingrich criticized the republican man of the year paul ryan. i don t think right wing social engineering has any more desirable than left wing social engineering. i don t think imposing radical change from the right or the left is a very good way for a free society to operate. i think we need a national conversation to get to a better medicare system with more choices for seniors. but not what paul ryan is suggesting. i think that is too big a jump. i m against obamacare which is imposing radical change and i ll