everything, really. the organisation, the way in which we have been selecting candidates, ourfunding base, candidates, our funding base, communications, candidates, ourfunding base, communications, what we did the social media. the whole thing needs a complete overhaul. could you write now tell us what voters should believe is here starmer s one central idea. if you could sum it up in a sentence in a way that we all know lots of people consume politics in the briefest of glimpses, what would you say was? it glimpses, what would you say was? . glimpses, what would you say was? , ., ., ., ., was? it is for him to do not me. was? it is for him to do not me- he was? it is for him to do not me. he speaks was? it is for him to do not me. he speaks on - was? it is for him to do not me. he speaks on his i was? it is for him to do not me. he speaks on his own| was? it is for him to do not i me. he speaks on his own behalf and i me. he speaks on his own behalf and i don t me. he speaks on
politicize what they re actually going to be standing for. people love that. like 73% of people think brands should stand for something, like they want them to take a stand. charles: i get a sense 73% says they should stand for what i believe in. nike put themselves on the line. when they say stand for something even if you lose everything and the first whiff of trouble you pull your jerseys out of your nike stores because you re afraid. they didn t stand for anything. barkley when he talked about other people doing business in china, i think some people viewed it hypocritical. not every business is injecting politics into like a lot of the sports teams have done domestically. they re taking a knee or doing something, trying to tackle partisan issues. when you take that internationally and talk about china and people it starts to affect the bottom line. people are like you can t say
somebody who is a relative to have an office in the white house. it s clearly improper. her meeting with people at the g-20 was absurd. charles: why was that absurd? i don t get it. she s spear heading several initiatives charles charles: that was bipartisan today and we re saying prisoners that nonviolent people out of prison because of her. charles, that s a deflection from the g-20, which is not didn t have anything to do with criminal justice reform. when we talk about this, what we re saying is that ivanka trump has no diplomatic experience, has no place to be amongst these world leaders and she s there, you know, because she s the president s daughter. charles: kayly, some would say a community organizer didn t have any experience. but when barack obama was president he was elected. charles: you know, here s the
this forward yes. you have process crimes. not being truthful. it s a criminal fraud theory if in fact they were pushing a narrative to a court that they knew wasn t the way they were presenting it. i m not getting ahead of anything. they have now moved to the grand jury phase. hopefully we ll know more. doug, thanks. thank you. stocks finishing in the green. the dow surging back near 27,000. the s&p 500 closing in on its all-time high. stocks gaining on optimism about trade and upbeat earnings reports. amazon shares heading in the opposite direction as costs from the one-day delivery weighs on its earnings. for the week, all the major averages finishing higher across the board. great week for the markets. democrats meanwhile continue to ramp up subpoenas for the impeachment inquiry after house republicans stormed a closed door testimony this week. an
notable six names. again, i don t me judge anything. no good lawyer should. we don t know what it is. i found it interested when i read some stuff and it was referred to about how the attorney general and john durham went over to italy. apparently this academic professor, you know, at one point was offering up negative information about candidate clinton and the point is, what they re looking at is the exact circumstances under which he decided to come forward with that. i don t want to get out in front of my ski tips, but the point is, you know, if that was some type of setup and it wasn t 100% kosher so you talk now about the potential six names that are floating out there. specifically like brennan. what exactly do you think they could be looking at with him? that s a great question. here s the thing. you know, when you translate this stuff to political rhetoric, it s interesting.