she is cuter than a 50-gallon drum full of bunny rabbits, live ones this time. i am here and lauren sivan,m kttvv reporter in los angeles. . and he is both drunk and a gent from the 1 percent, matthe mccall, penn financial groupfina founder and its president andand member.ru s donald trump says even he hasmy bad hair, my repulsivel sidekick, bill schulz.s the me and the skinny man with theo left wing plan. he hosts the allen combs show i week nights at 10:00 p.m. eastern on fox news radio. he is the tool who thinks stalin is cool.ch hello, pinch. in the in the times, they reported about western pennsylvania s hydrolic fracturing or to fracking to use the vernacular.
how do you dispute your findings? it s incredibly frustrating that the gas company won t admit the problems. i hear the same thing about people in denver lighting their water on fire. the gas company said there is naturely occurring methane in the water, but when the pennsylvania dep did the investigation, they found the gas from the deep shale layers and the industry misstated the facts when i first called them and i suspect this will be a similar conclusion. the fact is people on the ground all over america are reporting huge problems, and when those problems are reported to the industry i can defend myself on television. when these people say it to the gas company, they say, no, it s not true. that contamination is not from us. i will add this process was never really investigated. there was not a full investigation into hydrolic fracturing. it is a new process.
it s a chemical mixture that was not used before and at a much higher pressure, 9,000 pounds per square inch, 1,000 gallons a minute. this is it not the old fraking and the old gas drilling. they were exempted in 2005 prompted by dick cheney. when the natural gas industry comes forward and says these kinds of things, it s misleading. josh fox, director of gas land, and chris tucker, do you see whether you dispute do you see that the release of this documentary just might mean some of the regulations on this type of drilling might be re-examined as a result? just quickly, yes or no? hydrolic fracturing was regulated for years and was never covered under the safe drinking act. do you see a re-evaluation of regulation or examining whether
poles. has the cat been out playing with telephone poles? the cat stays inside. chris tucker, you don t buy the prems, and you don t necessarily buy what gas hand is telling people. why? we are talking about a process in hydrolic fracturing that s been used for 60 years. it s not new or unregulated or exotic. it s been used 1.1 million times. as recently as a couple of months ago when the u.s. senate committee asked top administrators at epa if they could identify a single case of water contamination, the answer is not one. the newness is not disputed. it s the testimony from people with it visuals there, someone with a lighter and the water has some kind of gas in it where it ignites, to the woman who talks
applause line his most self-assured performance yet. they packed the gymnasium to hear him indict president obama for what he called a record of failure for making a tough economy worse and it was for oat bough ma record on energy making it tougher to use her energy resources. he has 10 different agencies and four executive offices regulating hydrolic fracturing. we think coloradans know how to take care of this themselves. we want you to be in charge. reporter: just before his speech here at lakewood, congressman ryan sat down for his first solo interview since joining governor romney on the ticket. it was none other than the senior political analyst. he noted the relationship between governor romney and congressman ryan seemed to gel in april when they campaigned together in ryan s home state of wisconsin. what happened between you