the hush money thing is too petty in effect. what will they say about the federal indictment? not a local indictments, a federal indictment, regarding the nation s secrets. that will be interesting to see. we should pause to reflect on that, because many of you will say well they have an indicted. here s the difference between a local prosecutors, even in manhattan, as big as manhattan s. a local prosecutors indictments, and a federal indictment. there are a lot of people who are concerned in march when the earlier indictment happened. well it s a really good idea for presidents to be subjected to a local prosecutor? you can also find a prosecutor from the other side of the ideological aisle. whether there s texas for biden or something. there is concern about that. this is not that. this is the united states department, the justice representation, as a, whole making a case about criminal liability and the former president of the united states. that s a big deal. that means that the of
th the the way around. i i mean, that guy has as a pappalardo don t make that deal . he s already got a whole weekend that s already donise. o but he has a pathological need for media attention. here is someone who pled guilty to a slew of criminal conductt and not just not just the hush money thing. he pled guilty to lyin g to congress, lying to the banksa in his taxi medallion frauxid. you know, now that he s lied to the irs. he so he s a pathological liar.l and , you know, he s supposedly now reborn and he s on msnbc every night and he s their big. star. and i i wander wonder about the fact that he s on msnbc every night,w yet he s saying in his book hewy was only forced to plead guilty. he really didn t force. i will hnot even accepting responsibility. i m going to feel it with him and then but he pled guilty. was he pled guilty. but he s saying he was forced, o plead guilty to protect his wif wife. let me ask you this.e so it s been reported tonight
a record high for him, during these impeachment proceedings. is this an apples to apples comparison when you look at the president currently, or is it an apples to oranges sort of look here. meaning, should the democrats look at that and learn something or is this just different? i think the democrats should look at that and learn something. there is a parallel here, of course. and that is that bill clinton, they had impeachment proceedings against bill clinton, because he was charged basically with having sex, in the oval office. but then lying about it. and now we have a president who on the hush money thing, is accused of having sex. and then paying people to hush up, in effect, to lie about it. so there is that parallel. but i do think that after two years of, you know, of additional investigations, clinton was a much more sympathetic figure, because it suddenly happened out of the blue, and he was riding along and doing well as president.
misogynist bigot. do you believe either one of these omarosas? unfortunately, that first statement not entirely false and people have bowed down to president trump who said they never would and maybe she knew something about the power of the oval office and the ability of people to rationalize. and she said he would win. yeah, right. i think the hush money thing is amazing. if i m not mistaken, the former bodyguard is paid $15,000 a month by the campaign. i mean, really? this is now the situation we re in with someone disgruntled. fire you and give you money to keep you quiet. she rejected it. that s very revealing. i don t recall that in the past. white house aides leaving and being given money to keep quiet. bill, i have to say it s not surprising with the playboy playmate, the so it s a common theme that we re hearing with this president. with omarosa, look, trying to sell a book.