we had this play out. the word process is so important here. the due process is the issue even in the court of public opinion and the judiciary committee right now. it benefits both brett kavanaugh and his accuser, christine ford. both will have an opportunity to say what happened, their versions of the events and rebut or bolster the credibility of one s story. unlike the anita hill hearings that happened in 1991, you have a decade between those allegations and the confirmation process of then nominee clarence thomas. you have 36 years now between the allegations occurring and the confirmation here. that timing is going to play very, very important. i used to do a lot of delayed reporting sexual assault cases. the hurtles of a year or more, a year to five years is enormous, let alone 36. memory and credibility and her
her body then catapulted. and out goes the body and hurtles into the air. into the tree canopy that then carries her into the abyss and into that distant tree. this is what i think happened to explain the injuries on the chest and hips. and there was another bubble to burst in the prosecution s case, the motive for murder. stephen scharf wasn t a greedy killer, he said. his client never made a claim on that insurance policy. it was only after the money was turned over to the state years later, he said, that stephen scharf even bothered to collect. would it throw fuel on the fire not to do it. well, i know i look guilty because i am guilty i better not make this claim. you re damned if you do, you re damned if you don t. the other alleged motive, divorce, was flimsy as well, he
secure fence act. if this judge says wait a minute, these are procedures that you need to comply with, typically it can take months and some cases years to clear some of the regulatory and procedural hurtles. reporter: but the federal government is arguing when it comes to national security, federal authority supersedes state and environmental concerns. will it end the whole debate on the fence or the wall? no. but it could be a significant victory for one side or the other. reporter: whichever way judge curiel rules, this case could end up in front of the supreme court. rick: will carr, thank you very much. this just, in the daca debate will head to the senate floor tomorrow, a group of gop senators plans to bring forward commonsense proposal. it would add $25 million for border security and offers a pathway to citizenship for 1.8
secure fence act. if this judge says wait a minute, these are procedures that you need to comply with, typically it can take months and some cases years to clear some of the regulatory and procedural hurtles. reporter: but the federal government is arguing when it comes to national security, federal authority supersedes state and environmental concerns. will it end the whole debate on the fence or the wall? no. but it could be a significant victory for one side or the other. reporter: whichever way judge curiel rules, this case could end up in front of the supreme court. rick: will carr, thank you very much. this just, in the daca debate will head to the senate floor tomorrow, a group of gop senators plans to bring forward commonsense proposal. it would add $25 million for border security and offers a pathway to citizenship for 1.8
of .12. that was over the limit. it would be equivalent to approximately four average sized drinks or beer, something like that. a drunkful fall argued the defense. to back that up, the lawyer had his own heavy hitter. famed pathologist dr. cyril wekt. as high profile as the prosecution s dr. baden. only wekt had a totally different take on how jody scharf died. i would call this an accidental death. in wekt s version which he demonstrated with all things a teddy bear, jody fell off a cliff onto jagged rocks below causing her mortal woods. her body then catapulted. and out goes the body and hurtles into the air. into the tree canopy that