to answer your question. how serious? yes. they have to be very serious to be undertaken by such elite agents. i think i can answer this. we have to treat each taxpayer the same. that s the most important. we are kind of the agents that come in there, and we have the expertise to work these complex financial investigations, so whether there are more serious we have to treat each taxpayer the same, and that s what i try to do. i was referring to these particularly complex, high dollar i understand you have to give equal treatment. mr. zigler, you called the hunter biden investigations a complex criminal tax investigation. and i understand that it was an
guess the hunter biden investigations has been indicted by doj for being a chinese spy among other things. you write this, you and congressman raskin write this to congressman comer, quote, we are concerned that an official committee of the house of representatives has been manipulated by a con man who while a fugitive from justice attempted to fortify his defense by laundering unfounded and potentially false allegations through congress. it appears as if mr. luft sought whistle-blower status from you in an effort to defend himself from criminal prosecution while a funeral from justice. worse yet, this episode raises concerns that mr. luft may be manipulating your investigation not only for his own self-interest but perhaps in furtherance of the ccp s efforts to undermine u.s. security interests and the president of the united states. tell us what you this seems to go beyond politics and into a
lowell writes in part, your release of material violated the spirit, if not the letter of the tax laws in federal rules governing investigations. smith respopnded by vowing to continue the investigation. thank you very much. let s discuss the latest of mixed messages surrounding the drama of the hunter biden investigations. abby lowell is lashing out. releasing the transcripts of and exists from interviews of self-styled irs whis blowers who may be claiming that title in an attempt to evade their own misconduct was an obvious employee to feed the misinformation campaign to harm our client as a vehicle to attack his father. what do you make of that kind of
interest will accrue. the white house also expressed disappointment in a second supreme court ruling in favor of a web site designer refusing to create designs for same-sex weddings. the high court said compliance would violate the right to free speech. white house officials called that discriminatory. despite all the rulings this week, the president is still not in favor of expanding the court, dealing a blow to progressives. instead he s signaling that a key part of his 2024 campaign will be highlighting the consequences of electing republicans, shannon. jacqui heinrich at the white house, thank you very much. we ll discuss all this with the panel there are growing concerns tonight about the leadership of the hunter biden investigations. some of those questions involve the u.s. attorney for the district of columbia and whether he has or is blocking efforts to bring charges against the president s son in that location. meanwhile, republicans are pushing for more information about