financially benefited from these meetingsbenefitt, for exa, there s an implication by hunter himself that he was tired of giving half his income to perhaps he was tired forpayig paying for repairs on his father s home, et cetera. o if if the money side of ths is proven, what is the legaly fo potential liability for joe biden, the president? because congressman colmar said this is an investigation into the president of the united states . he didn t say hunter.inve hest saiigd joe biden was, you. know, one of the oldest sayingsh in washington.e but th coveit s not the crime, but the cover up that usually gets o trouble. you know, influence peddlinge pa is a virtual cottage industry inage washington. i ve been a critic of this form of corruption for decades, although i have to tell you, i ve never seen anything on this scale with the biden family appears to have done i ally is far beyond most of the appetite of most of these
into this and hownt political that justice department has become. th but it gets even deeper because the fbi had hunter s laptop since december of 2019. okay, then we head into the e the election in 2020le. they knew that t the likelihood anat this that this in fact would be made public was real.de and you have members, the fbi meeting weekly with every big tech company warningng them th t this type of story about hunter, according to your roth ,might actually come out and you don t want to be to disseminating false informatione . that sounds to me like the fbi i that should have known prettykny darn well by that point elevens months later that that laptop was real. they rat laptos real. e tellie on the lookout because it s probably false. it turns they did intimidate every big tech company. evat does that mean? in terms of putting the thumbs on the scales of a presidential election? well, yeah, that s exactly what they did. but by then telling big tech