it would be interesting. i think on it would be interesting. i think on a it would be interesting. i think on a humourous i it would be interesting. i. think on a humourous note, after think on a humourous note, after 30 think on a humourous note, after 30 years think on a humourous note, after 30 years of think on a humourous note, after 30 years of law - think on a humourous note, i after 30 years of law practice i after 30 years of law practice i don t after 30 years of law practice idon t think after 30 years of law practice i don t think i ve after 30 years of law practice i don t think i ve ever- after 30 years of law practice i don t think i ve ever storedl i don t think i ve ever stored documents i don t think i ve ever stored documents in i don t think i ve ever stored documents in a i don t think i ve ever stored documents in a shower, - i don t think i ve ever stored documents in a shower, but| documents in a shower, but apparently documents in a shower,
what did you make of it? so, and obviously my colleagues as well, i don t think there was much in the way - that was inconsistent. with what we expected. much of these factsj have come out over the course of time, not necessarily in a way- that was acknowledged, at least to the media, but i would say that one thing that surprised me - factually was how personally involved the allegations - are with the former president, particularly with even packing i up boxes and going through the boxes. j those were always things that would make a significant- difference in any prosecution but we did not have any real| reported evidence of it, so i m also surprised i the prosecutor thinks. they had about 21 days to try this case, i m not quite sure it would take that long, i it would be interesting. i think on a humourous note, after 30 years of law practicej i don t think i ve ever stored